Check your switch configure port to fullduplex Quinta 02 Setembro 2004 14:52, Margaret Doll escreveu: > Does anyone know why this would start happening to a system? The > system was running > Rh 9.0. I upgraded it to RH Enterprise ES 3 a week ago Wednesday. > > Sep 2 10:46:45 server kernel: eth0: Transmit error, Tx status register > 82. > Sep 2 10:46:45 server kernel: Probably a duplex mismatch. See > Documentation/networking/vorte > x.txt > Sep 2 10:46:45 server kernel: Flags; bus-master 1, dirty 32019(3) > current 32019(3) > Sep 2 10:46:45 server kernel: Transmit list 00000000 vs. cf09c2c0. > Sep 2 10:46:45 server kernel: 0: @cf09c200 length 800005ea status > 000105ea > Sep 2 10:46:45 server kernel: 1: @cf09c240 length 800005ea status > 000105ea > Sep 2 10:46:45 server kernel: 2: @cf09c280 length 800005ea status > 800105ea > Sep 2 10:46:45 server kernel: 3: @cf09c2c0 length 800005ea status > 000105ea > Sep 2 10:46:45 server kernel: 4: @cf09c300 length 800005ea status > 000105ea > Sep 2 10:46:45 server kernel: 5: @cf09c340 length 800005ea status > 000105ea > Sep 2 10:46:45 server kernel: 6: @cf09c380 length 800005ea status > 000105ea > Sep 2 10:46:45 server kernel: 7: @cf09c3c0 length 800005ea status > 000105ea > Sep 2 10:46:45 server kernel: 8: @cf09c400 length 800005ea status > 000105ea > Sep 2 10:46:45 server kernel: 9: @cf09c440 length 800005ea status > 000105ea > Sep 2 10:46:45 server kernel: 10: @cf09c480 length 800005ea status > 000105ea > Sep 2 10:46:45 server kernel: 11: @cf09c4c0 length 800005ea status > 000105ea > Sep 2 10:46:45 server kernel: 12: @cf09c500 length 800005ea status > 000105ea > Sep 2 10:46:45 server kernel: 13: @cf09c540 length 800005ea status > 000105ea > Sep 2 10:46:45 server kernel: 14: @cf09c580 length 800005ea status > 000105ea > Sep 2 10:46:45 server kernel: 15: @cf09c5c0 length 800005ea status > 000105ea > > > Thanks -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
