Re: Non-random PIDs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 05:36:36PM -0400, Jason Dixon wrote:
> Nevertheless, you have to ask yourself, what advantage is there to
> generating a pid as pid+1, rather than via entropy?  If all things
> are equal, I would think that random PID generation is simply a
> better design.

There is, actually, some use in knowing that PIDs are assigned in an
incremental fashion.  Simply by glancing at a ps output, the savvy sysadmin
can identify very old processes.

Small, perhaps, but no smaller than any advantage a random PID may give.

Cheers,
-- 
	Dave Ihnat
	ignatz@xxxxxxxxxx


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [Kernel Development]     [PAM]     [Fedora Users]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [Gimp]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Yosemite News]     [Red Hat Crash Utility]


  Powered by Linux