Eucke Warren wrote: > Steve, > > /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf has the following enabled > > required_hits 5 > rewrite_subject 1 > subject_tag [SPAM] > > I am running 2.44-11.8.x as per rpm -q. I am running the > spamass-milter -0.2.0. I do not believe that report_safe is an > option for this vintage of spamassassin and -m is deprecated in > future use and isn't what I want anyway. Are you running a newer > version or are you running the same as me? According to the > spamassassin.org site the report safe did not become an option until > the 2.5-x series. Or did I miss something? (THAT'S always > possible....) > > Thank you again > > -Eucke As of Dec. 2003, I have since switched to using postfix/SA as my MTA. But prior to this, I did use sendmail/spamass-milter/SA. In fact, I still maintain backups of my sendmail/spamass-milter/SA config files from my RH9 system. Unfortunately, I can't tell what version of SA I was running at that time. Probably the latest available rpm for RH9 (like 2.5x ?). I'm now running SA-2.63-8 on an FC2 system. For reference, my backup config files from my RH9 system... [root@excelsior mail]# pwd /home/scowles/backups/voyager/etc/mail [root@excelsior mail]# grep spamass sendmail.mc INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`spamassassin', `S=local:/var/run/spamass.sock, F=, T=C:15m;S:4m;R:4m;E:10m') [root@excelsior sysconfig]# pwd /home/scowles/backups/voyager/etc/sysconfig [root@excelsior sysconfig]# cat spamass-milter # Local spamass-milter config SM_SOCKET=/var/run/spamass.sock SM_EXTRA_FLAGS="-i 192.168.9.0/24" [root@excelsior sysconfig]# cat spamd # Add options for spamassassin (spamd) OPTIONS="-d -a -u nobody -L" [root@excelsior spamassassin]# pwd /home/scowles/backups/voyager/etc/mail/spamassassin <cut/paste from local.cf> rewrite_subject 0 use_terse_reports 1 report_safe 1 skip_rbl_checks 1 My SA config requirements are actually quite simple: 1) Only add the SA headers regarding spam 2) Do not modify the subject line (rewrite_subject) 3) If tagged as spam, encapsulate the email as an attachment (report_safe) 4) My MTA does RBL checking, so disable SA rbl checks. FWIW: I do remember changing the above SA config options during my testing phase. During this time, I don't remember having any problems with spamass-milter-0.2.0 not passing any change that SA made back to sendmail for final delivery. I initially wanted SA to rewrite the subject line, but figured out that testing the e-mail headers for the X-Spam-Status: Yes/No flag was a better approach. Hope the above helps Steve Cowles -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
