Re: OT: Mandrake equivalent of Redhat

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 11:57:21AM -0400, rahul b jain cs student wrote:
> I have been trying to install redhat 9.0 on my HP ze4400 since a week now
> and have not been successful. So I am planning to install mandrake on it.

So why do we care?  If you're looking to install Red Hat Linux 9 (which
is obsolete so you should be installing at a minimum Fedora Core 2),
then you can ask here for help and we'll help you through the issues.
Switching to a different distributor's product may or may not work.
You'll certainly get a bunch of new issues though.

> Does anyone know which version of mandrake is equivalent to redhat 9.0 ?
> Also which version of mandrake will have 2.4.20-18.9smp kernel equivalent
> ?

We probably don't know and probably don't care.  You might want to ask
on a Mandrake list where you're more than likely to find people more
familiar with Mandrake.  As for "equivalent", there isn't one - they're
different products from different vendors.  If they were equivalent, you
wouldn't be successful with it either :-)

I won't even get into the question of why you're insisting on an smp
kernel on a single processor laptop..

FWIW, a quick Google search for "linux ze4400" does find some resources
for getting Linux working on this thing.

-- 
Ed Wilts, RHCE
Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:ewilts@xxxxxxxxxx
Member #1, Red Hat Community Ambassador Program


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [Kernel Development]     [PAM]     [Fedora Users]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [Gimp]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Yosemite News]     [Red Hat Crash Utility]


  Powered by Linux