> and of course he accessed via wireless 3000 miles away, > hahaha. I hope you > get the joke. (who cares about wireless) I do, I don't need some corporate a-hole plugging his little air port into my network and opening a HUGE backdoor for some troll like you to exploit. > -----Original Message----- > From: Otto Haliburton [mailto:ottohaliburton@xxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Friday, June 25, 2004 9:53 AM > To: 'General Red Hat Linux discussion list' > Subject: RE: Router/Firewall Recommendation > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:redhat-list- > > bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Eucke > > Sent: Friday, June 25, 2004 8:34 AM > > To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list > > Subject: Re: Router/Firewall Recommendation > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Otto Haliburton" <ottohaliburton@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > To: <techlist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "'General Red Hat > Linux discussion > > list'" <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: Friday, June 25, 2004 6:12 AM > > Subject: RE: Router/Firewall Recommendation > > > > > > > here it is again, all thieves can get around all alarms > on any car, but > > why > > > waste the effort on a protected car when there are many > unprotected cars > > out > > > there. People that are out to network these computers > together are > > going > > to > > > waste there time on a computer behind a firewall when > there are many > > > computers on the internet without one. That's what is > meant by keep it > > > simple simon (or stupid or whatever needs to go there). > If you have the > > > option of using a 3000 dollar machine as a router, good > for you, but a > > > simple effective alternative is a 40 dollar router. You > get the point. > > > > LBB? Linux Router with stateful inspection? Cisco > "Gibson" watching your > > connection? Guess what? Some Jackass in the sales department just > > plugged > > a Wireless Access Point into your network without talking > to anyone in IT > > and your wonderful firewall is now meaningless. Guys, > please put this > > thread to bed. There's been alot of opinions thrown about > and read by the > > people asking for them. Let them decide which route to go > and accept that > > your view may not be accepted as law...it's kinda how these > things go.... > > Can we get back to the business of "peer assistance" that > this list is > > meant > > for and leave the "leg pissing" to other lists? > > > > -Eucke > > > and of course he accessed via wireless 3000 miles away, > hahaha. I hope you > get the joke. (who cares about wireless) > > > > -- > redhat-list mailing list > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list