-----Message d'origine----- De : Pete Nesbitt [mailto:pete@xxxxxxxxx] Envoyé : vendredi 16 avril 2004 15:30 À : yann.garcia@xxxxxxxxxxxx; General Red Hat Linux discussion list Objet : Re: Router problems on Redhat 9.0 Linux 2.4.20-13.9.HOSTAP Yann, please add to posts at end of message. It is easier to follow that way.... (see below) On April 16, 2004 12:18 am, Yann Garcia wrote: > Hi Pete, > > Thank you for your help. > > If I use a range of address 10.1.0.1 to 10.1.0.50 using a net mask > 255.255.255.0, is it ok? > > Cheers, > > Yann Garcia > > -----Message d'origine----- > De : redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] De la part de Pete Nesbitt > Envoyé : vendredi 16 avril 2004 03:33 > À : yann.garcia@xxxxxxxxxxxx; General Red Hat Linux discussion list > Objet : Re: Router problems on Redhat 9.0 Linux 2.4.20-13.9.HOSTAP > > On April 15, 2004 12:21 am, Yann Garcia wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On my Linux box, I have two network interfaces: a LAN interface (eth0) > > and > > > a WLAN (wlan0). I set ip forwarding in /etc/sysctl.conf. I start a > > sniffer > > > (tethereal) on both interfaces. When I make a ping from WLAN network > > to LAN > > > network, ping don? cross my gateway. The networks infos are: > > eth0: 10.0.1.37/16 > > wlan0: 10.0.10.1/24 > > The route tables are (netstat ?rn): > > Destination Passerelle Genmask Indic MSS > > Fenetre irtt Iface 10.0.10.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U > > > > 0 0 0 wlan0 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 > > U > > > 0 0 0 eth0 169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 > > U > > > 0 0 0 wlan0 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 > > > > U 0 0 0 lo 0.0.0.0 10.0.0.1 0.0.0.0 > > > > UG 0 0 0 eth0 > > > > The iptables rules are (iptables ?L ?n ?v): > > Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 17346 packets, 1205K bytes) > > pkts bytes target prot opt in out source > > > > destination > > > > Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes) > > pkts bytes target prot opt in out source > > > > destination > > > > Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 17144 packets, 1306K bytes) > > pkts bytes target prot opt in out source > > > > destination > > > > I?m sorry but I don?t understand why my gateway doesn?t work! > > > > Thank you very much for your assistance, > > > > Best regards, > > > > Yann Garcia > > Software Engineer > > > > SmartCom > > 400, Av Roumanille - BP 309 > > 06906 Sophia Antipolis Cedex > > France > > > > Tel: +33 493 008 746 > > Fax: +33 493 001 101 > > Mail: yann.garcia@xxxxxxxxxxxx > > Site: www.smartcom.com > > Hi, > Your eth0's network contains of the wlan IP range. > 10.0.1.37/16 is part of a network ip range of 10.0.0.1 to 10.0.255.254 > Your wlan range is inside that so no routing is performed. > > You want to use a class C range for the wlan, so instead of 10.0.10.0 > network, > try using one of the 192.168. class C networks. It may make be best to > use 2 > different 192.168 networks (say 192.168.0.0/24 for LAN and > 192.168.1.0/24 for > the WLAN). > > Class A 1.0.0.0 - 127.255.255.255 > Class B 128.0.0.0 - 191.255.255.255 > Class C 192.0.0.0 - 223.255.255.255 > > Hope that helps. > -- > Pete Nesbitt, rhce > > > -- > redhat-list mailing list > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list Hi Yann, The 10.1 range should be fine. But again, the 192.168 is also a in the private IP range, so it is a a good choice and less confusing. Pete -- Pete Nesbitt, rhce Hi Pete, Sorry, I forgot to add the text to posts at end of the message. My problem is that I work in a business center. The range 192.168.x.y is already used: 'x' is affected for each company which rents offices in the business center. Cheers, Yann Garcia -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
