It would appear that on Apr 5, Anthony E. Greene did say: > On 01-Apr-2004/17:58 +0000, "Joe(theWordy)Philbrook" <jtwdyp@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> Unfortunately, not every mail client's as good as pine. > > > >Of course not. After all pine is simply the "best" mail client. <chuckle> > >I'm especially fond of it's letting me choose vim to compose with... I > >haven't found the editor's attached to most gui mail clients nearly so > >user friendly. <grin> Though I suppose it's possible that some of them > >may let me select an alternate editor? > > I alternated between pine and various GUI mailers for a long time... then > I found mutt. For a power mail user who's fairly good with a keyboard, > mutt is the way to go. Pine is okay, but mutt is the Real Thing. Accept > no substitutes. ;-) > > Tony Well maybe... I'll admit to having glanced only briefly at mutt. I didn't try to actually set it up, just glanced at it's interface. And quickly decided that IF I stopped using pine, I'd think about it... Which is more than I can say for ANY of the gui mailers... I've been using pine on various systems for so long now that I'd have a hard time adjusting. Heck even though I don't LIKE to go there much, I even put pcpine in my windows partition just so that I could have nearly the same interface everyplace. But mutt does seam to have a following... Tell me, how well does mutt do at having multiple inbox folders???? [I have 3 remote pop, 1 remote imap, & my local spool inbox. plus several ~/mail/folders] -- | ~^~ ~^~ | <?> <?> Joe (theWordy) Philbrook | ^ J(tWdy)P | \___/ <<jtwdyp@xxxxxxxx>> -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
