end-of-life of Red Hat Linux 9.0.... whats the solution... I have 12 servers runing with linux 9.0 ----- Original Message ----- From: <redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx> To: <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 7:38 PM Subject: redhat-list Digest, Vol 2, Issue 1 > Send redhat-list mailing list submissions to > redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx > > You can reach the person managing the list at > redhat-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxx > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of redhat-list digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. RE: Sync Clocks (Tobias Speckbacher) > 2. Re: Java Optimization on RHEL (Ed Wilts) > 3. Re: rexecd (Ed Wilts) > 4. Re: Sync Clocks (Rodolfo J. Paiz) > 5. Re: (OT) Mail got blocked because of SORBS/DYNABLOCK (Ed Wilts) > 6. Re: max LV size in RHEL3 kernel 2.4? (Ed Wilts) > 7. RE: Samba browser fail (Peter Smith) > 8. SMSterm (edy) > 9. Fedora or others? (lito lampitoc) > 10. Re: (OT) Mail got blocked because of SORBS/DYNABLOCK > (Reuben D. Budiardja) > 11. Re: Fwd: Please confirm your email for brent@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > (Joe(theWordy)Philbrook) > 12. PVM and .Xauthority (Ryan Golhar) > 13. Re: (OT) Mail got blocked because of SORBS/DYNABLOCK (MKlinke) > 14. Re: Fedora or others? (Rodolfo J. Paiz) > 15. Re: (OT) Mail got blocked because of SORBS/DYNABLOCK (MKlinke) > 16. Re: USB Printer (kluu te) > 17. RE: physical memory support under RHEL for Opteron > (Chiu, PCM (Peter) ) > 18. Re: Fwd: Please confirm your email for brent@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > (Gary Stainburn) > 19. Re: (OT) Mail got blocked because of SORBS/DYNABLOCK > (Reuben D. Budiardja) > 20. Re: (OT) Mail got blocked because of SORBS/DYNABLOCK > (Reuben D. Budiardja) > 21. MAILMAN STRANGE FILES (John Jacks) > 22. Re: (OT) Mail got blocked because of SORBS/DYNABLOCK (Ed Wilts) > 23. Re: (OT) Mail got blocked because of SORBS/DYNABLOCK > (Reuben D. Budiardja) > 24. RE: physical memory support under RHEL for Opteron > (Joshua Baker-LePain) > 25. Re: (OT) Mail got blocked because of SORBS/DYNABLOCK (Gerry Doris) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 17:26:45 -0800 > From: "Tobias Speckbacher" <tobias@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: RE: Sync Clocks > To: "General Red Hat Linux discussion list" <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: > <FF83FA30299A76448B4AC6026257A8840364CA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Set your cron to execute 'rdate -s some-ntp-server' > > Pick whichever you feel is appropriate for you from > http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~mills/ntp/servers.html . > > You may have to install the rdate package, other options involve > configuring ntp ... more info about that at http://www.ntp.org. > > -T > > -----Original Message----- > From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Hernan Dario > Arredondo > Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 5:08 PM > To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Sync Clocks > > Hi everyone > > > I had a problem: > > I had a Dell PowerEdge with RHL AS 2.1 and oracle ent. 9.2.03, the > system > clock go forward 30sec every day (each 15 day go 7min), but the hardware > clock works fine , how can I sync the clocks with out program a cron > job, > Do I need to apply some patch ??? > > Regard > > > Hernan D- > > > -- > redhat-list mailing list > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 19:46:10 -0600 > From: Ed Wilts <ewilts@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Java Optimization on RHEL > To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <20040401014610.GA4704@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 08:53:42AM -0500, Chris Purcell wrote: > > > We're about to set up an active/passive cluster on two RHEL ES 3.0 > > > servers. The servers will host a Java app that is very resource > > > intensive. The servers are Compaq ProLiant DL380's with dual P4's and > > > 4GBs of RAM each. > > > > > > I don't know anything about Java, I just do the system administration > > > here. Are there any Java performance tuning tweaks that can be done to > > > the servers to improve the performance of the servers? > > > > Anybody? If no one knows, is there a better place to ask this question? > > Maybe on the Sun Java list perhaps? > > How about taroon-list where the RHEL-specific discussions are taking > place? > > .../Ed > -- > Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA > mailto:ewilts@xxxxxxxxxx > Member #1, Red Hat Community Ambassador Program > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 19:48:17 -0600 > From: Ed Wilts <ewilts@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: rexecd > To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <20040401014817.GB4704@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 07:59:58AM -0600, Hemond, Steve wrote: > > I need rexecd to be installed on my RedHat Linux 9 box. Yum didn't > > find rexecd in any repository. How can I install it? Maybe it is part > > of another package? > > It's in rsh-server on RHEL. > > -- > Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA > mailto:ewilts@xxxxxxxxxx > Member #1, Red Hat Community Ambassador Program > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 20:02:46 -0600 > From: "Rodolfo J. Paiz" <rpaiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Sync Clocks > To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <6.0.3.0.0.20040331195957.0251f008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed > > At 19:08 3/31/2004, you wrote: > >I had a Dell PowerEdge with RHL AS 2.1 and oracle ent. 9.2.03, the system > >clock go forward 30sec every day (each 15 day go 7min), but the hardware > >clock works fine , how can I sync the clocks with out program a cron job, > > I suggest that you have some NTP server always available for the rest of > the machines on your network, so that all of them can keep the correct > time. In this case, if this is an important server, then it may as well be > the time server too. :-) But even if you don't use this machine to serve > the time to others, running "ntpd" (the Network Time Protocol Daemon) on it > will keep its clock perfectly synchronized to the correct time. And after a > day or two, ntpd will also adjust how fast your computer's clock runs so it > does not waver. > > It is not difficult to set up, but you can post to this list if you have > any problems. > > > -- > Rodolfo J. Paiz > rpaiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://www.simpaticus.com > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 20:06:58 -0600 > From: Ed Wilts <ewilts@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: (OT) Mail got blocked because of SORBS/DYNABLOCK > To: techlist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, General Red Hat Linux discussion > list <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <20040401020658.GC4704@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 03:39:08PM -0500, Reuben D. Budiardja wrote: > > > > Sorry if this is a little bit OT, but I know some people is knowledgeable > > about this. > > Guilty :-) > > > But when I check the originating IP of this user (he uses his own ISP) here: > > http://www.dnsbl.us.sorbs.net/cgi-bin/lookup?js&IP= > > > > I found entry in the "Dynamic IP Space " section. Looks like his ISP, or even > > his IP block is in the list of SORBS. > > And this > > http://mail-abuse.org/cgi-bin/lookup > > > > shows his originating IP in the DUL list (whatever that is). > > DUL = Dialup User List > > Basically what is happening is that the SMTP server is using a > dynamically assigned IP address. Every SMTP server has the option of > checking the list of dynamically assigned addresses to accept or deny > that particular transaction. Many major ISPs now check this list for > incoming e-mail. They also notify the collectors of changes in this > address space. Naturally, they will check this for incoming e-mail, but > not originating e-mail which they expect to come from their own > subscribers with dynamic addresses. > > By checking this list, you have the potentially to block a *LOT* of > spam. Infected systems on a cable modem have been measured to send 1 > million or more e-mails per day. Personally, I have an SMTP server > running and I block e-mail from dynamic addresses even though I'm on a > dynamic address myself. > > The workaround for the end user is to forward all e-mail to the ISP. In > sendmail, that's known as a smart host, like this: > # grep [ewilts@p6000 ewilts]$ grep -i smart /etc/mail/sendmail.mc > define(`SMART_HOST',`smtp:smtp.comcast.net')dnl > > smtp.comcast.net does nice things like throttle large amounts of e-mail. > It normally has absolutely no impact unless I blast stuff out to a > mailing list, in which case it slows the e-mails down by blocking new > e-mails from me for a while and then accepting them again. sendmail > handles that transparently. The advantage to me is I feel a bit more > protected about people using comcast to blast spam out. I wouldn't feel > offended at all if comcast blocked me getting out directly via port 25 > and forced us all comcast users to use their mail servers. Every little > bit ISPs can do to reduce spam woud help. > > -- > Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA > mailto:ewilts@xxxxxxxxxx > Member #1, Red Hat Community Ambassador Program > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 20:10:01 -0600 > From: Ed Wilts <ewilts@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: max LV size in RHEL3 kernel 2.4? > To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <20040401021001.GD4704@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 02:47:17PM -0600, Alexander Lazarevich wrote: > > I'm using lvm-1.0.3-15 on RHEL3-AS, kernel 2.4.21-9.0.1.ELsmp. > > > > I've got two SCSI devices attached to the system, each one is 1.74TB in > > size. I want to make a single ext3 filesystem out of those devices. So I > > thought I'd try using LVM. > > I believe I read the discussion thread on taroon-list a while ago that > 2TB is still the limit. Please check the archives for taroon-list > (which is where you should post RHEL-specific queries). > > -- > Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA > mailto:ewilts@xxxxxxxxxx > Member #1, Red Hat Community Ambassador Program > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 12:11:46 +1000 > From: "Peter Smith" <pasmith@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: RE: Samba browser fail > To: "General Red Hat Linux discussion list" <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <NDBBKOGGKKKMCAFFBHGFKEEMEFAA.pasmith@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > See below: > > -----Original Message----- > From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Edward Dekkers > Sent: Thursday, 1 April 2004 11:25 AM > To: pasmith@xxxxxxxxxxxx; General Red Hat Linux discussion list > Subject: Re: Samba browser fail > > > Peter Smith wrote: > > > See Below: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx > > [mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Edward Dekkers > > Sent: Thursday, 1 April 2004 10:28 AM > > To: pasmith@xxxxxxxxxxxx; General Red Hat Linux discussion list > > Subject: Re: Samba browser fail > > > > > > Peter Smith wrote: > > > >>Hello again, > >> > >>I have Googled all day without finding anything helpful. > >> > >>I am running RedHat 7.3, kernel 2.4.18-3, samba 2.2.7-security-rollup-fix, > >>in an NT4 domain. > >> > >>This system was running well until I reinstalled the OS. I am using a > > > > copy > > > >>of the smb.conf and so on that were working before. > >> > >>Now, while samba seems to be rinning OK, and the system can mount Windows > >>shares without problems, Windows machines cannot see the samba machine at > >>all. There is an error report on browsing problems every 15 minutes. > >> > >>I append output from the log.nmbd file, starting from where the samba > > > > server > > > >>successfully joined the NT domain, followed by the [global] section of > >>smb.conf. > >> > >>Has anyone come across this before? > >> > >>Thanks for all your help in the past, > >>Peter Smith > >> > >>============================================= > >>[2004/03/31 14:17:42, 0] nmbd/nmbd.c:terminate(59) > >> Got SIGTERM: going down... > >>[2004/03/31 14:19:26, 0] nmbd/nmbd.c:main(794) > >> Netbios nameserver version 2.2.7-security-rollup-fix started. > >> Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1994-2002 > >>[2004/03/31 14:19:26, 0] param/loadparm.c:map_parameter(2077) > >> Unknown parameter encountered: "allow null passwords" > >>[2004/03/31 14:19:26, 0] param/loadparm.c:lp_do_parameter(2751) > >> Ignoring unknown parameter "allow null passwords" > >>[2004/03/31 14:24:52, 0] > >>nmbd/nmbd_become_lmb.c:become_local_master_stage2(404) > >> ***** > >> > >> Samba name server BACKSERV is now a local master browser for workgroup > > > > WBM > > > >>on subnet 192.168.0.4 > >> > >> ***** > >>[2004/03/31 14:25:14, 0] > >>nmbd/nmbd_browsesync.c:find_domain_master_name_query_fail(358) > >> find_domain_master_name_query_fail: > >> Unable to find the Domain Master Browser name WBM<1b> for the workgroup > >>WBM. > >> Unable to sync browse lists in this workgroup. > >>[2004/03/31 14:40:14, 0] > >>nmbd/nmbd_browsesync.c:find_domain_master_name_query_fail(358) > >> find_domain_master_name_query_fail: > >> Unable to find the Domain Master Browser name WBM<1b> for the workgroup > >>WBM. > >> Unable to sync browse lists in this workgroup. > >>============================================= > >>[global] > >> wins server = 192.168.0.6 > >> passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u > >> pam password change = Yes > >> printing = lprng > >> dns proxy = No > >> encrypt passwords = Yes > >> allow null passwords = Yes > >> socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_SNDBUF=14596 > >>SO_RCVBUF=14596 > >> max log size = 0 > >> preferred master = No > >> password server = ECOSERV > >> obey pam restrictions = Yes > >> passwd chat = *New*password* %n\n *Retype*new*password* %n\n > >>*passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*updated*successfully* > >> security = DOMAIN > >> unix password sync = Yes > >> server string = %L Samba Server %v > >> workgroup = WBM > >> log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log > >> netbios name = BACKSERV > >> os level = 33 > >> kernel oplocks = No > >> domain master = No > >>============================================= > > > > > > >I could be wrong but it looks to me like it can't find the master for > > >the domain, hence it can't add itself to the browse list stored on the > > >other server. In a domain setup, there is only one master browser. > > > > >Regards, > > >Ed. > > > > Well, yes, that is what I thought - but it knows about the PDC and the > > password server. > > > > What else can I tell it? There doesn't seem to be an option for > specifying > > the name (or IP) of the master browser. > > >A very stupid question, as you more than likely know what you're doing > >but your firewall (if you have one - you should), IS allowing the > >netbios crap through for proper conversation with the PDC right? > > >Regards, > >Ed. > > Everything is inside the firewall. Besides, it was all working before I > reinstalled RH 7.3. > The smb.conf was copied from the previous install. I am part way through > apt-getting the latest upgrades, but this problem shows up in log.nmbd > immediately after the re-install from the RH 7.3 boxed set. > > I have a number of odd problems here at the moment, and the only common > factor appears to be me. Scary ... > > Thanks, > Peter > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 8 > Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 09:57:05 +0700 > From: "edy" <edy_apku@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: SMSterm > To: "Redhat" <Redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <000d01c41795$0404dcd0$1466a8b6@mmu> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Hi, > i need help in smsterm.i already install smsterm on redhat 9.0 but when i try tail -f smsterm.log an error occurs say: > > SMSTerm-0.6.1: Opening logfile at Thu Apr 1 09:39:47 2004 > Trying to connect...failed:socket error[server]: IO::Socket::INET: Bad hostname 'login.icq.com' > sending: > SMSTerm initialised. > Terminating SMSTerm > Exiting.. > SMSTerm-0.6.1: Closing logfile at Thu Apr 1 09:41:38 2004 > > > what should i check and do to fix this errors?? > > Thanks and Regards, > Edy > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: /archives/redhat-list/attachments/20040401/c067c388/attachment.htm > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 9 > Date: 01 Apr 2004 12:04:24 +0800 > From: lito lampitoc <ral@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Fedora or others? > To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <1080792264.2708.28.camel@lito> > Content-Type: text/plain > > Hello All, > > I am currently in a dilemma of whether to use Fedora Core 1 or use other > distribution for my production servers. I know this may sound silly for > others to consider deploying Fedora for production servers but my > organization is just a poor foundation begging big companies for a dime. > > I am currently running RedHat 8.0 and I am very comfortable with RedHat > since I started using it way back 1999. The news of RH ending life for > 8.0 last December and 9.0 this April left me in shock, I thought it was > fortunate that Fedora is there, but I can't trust it since it is just a > test version. For a while, I thought of shifting to other rpm based > distro like Mandrake, but I'm having second thoughts because my skills > are honed for RH and I really loved this distro. > > Currently, I am running a web, mail, ftp, radius, mysql on my RH 8.0 > servers on WAN. I need a secure and stable distribution that is free and > still leverage my RH skills. Debian sounds great, but I don't like it. > > Can anybody shed some light? any recommendation is appreciated. > > > Thanks. > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 10 > Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 23:18:12 -0500 > From: "Reuben D. Budiardja" <techlist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: (OT) Mail got blocked because of SORBS/DYNABLOCK > To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <200403312318.12345.techlist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > On Wednesday 31 March 2004 09:06 pm, Ed Wilts wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 03:39:08PM -0500, Reuben D. Budiardja wrote: > <snip> > > > > DUL = Dialup User List > > > > Basically what is happening is that the SMTP server is using a > > dynamically assigned IP address. <snip> > > No, my SMTP server is not in dial up, it's static. OK, let me try to explain > my question again. > > A friend of mine uses dial-up/cable with his ISP (Bellsouth). He uses MS > Outlook client. I gave him account on my mail server (has static IP, SMTP > Auth, IMAP). I told him to put in my mail server domain name as the SMTP > server when setting up MS Outlook. > Then, he sent email, he got tagged as RECV_IN_DYNABLOCK. Why? > > I use Kmail on my desktop (which is different than the mail server), I put in > this same mail server domain as my SMTP, and I tried sending email to the > same address that he tried. My email did not trigger any rule. > > So that confuses me. If he's using my SMTP server, he should not get tagged, > regardless of his IP, cause he's using a legit SMTP server (which is mine, on > static domain). Could someone tell me what I am missing? > > Thanks a lot for the replies. > > RDB > -- > Reuben D. Budiardja > Department of Physics and Astronomy > The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN > --------------------------------------------------------- > "To be a nemesis, you have to actively try to destroy > something, don't you? Really, I'm not out to destroy > Microsoft. That will just be a completely unintentional > side effect." > - Linus Torvalds - > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 11 > Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 23:12:44 +0000 (UTC) > From: "Joe(theWordy)Philbrook" <jtwdyp@xxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Fwd: Please confirm your email for brent@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.50.0403312213250.17277-100000@localhost> > Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII > > Seams like a lose/lose situation, either the list's contributors get > pummeled with these very annoying "http://www.MailStation.US"; links. OR > "http://www.MailStation.US"; users have to give up on an easy anti-spam > solution. > > Unless of course there is a simple compromise... Steve says the problem > is that the "From:" header line doesn't indicate the redhat list? > Might I suggest that those list users who wish yo use that kind of > spamblocking subscribe instead to the "Digest" version. Then the actual > "From:" header would say "redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx" with > individual subjects embedded in the attachments. If a list user can't do > without such an inane form of spam protection on the mailbox used to > subscribe, then I think it's only common courtesy for them to subscribe > to the version that can be programed into their white list. > > Wouldn't that solve the problem? Err of course that is IF and only IF > you can get the "http://www.MailStation.US"; users to settle for the > digest... > > Granted the "Digest" may take a little getting used to for some. And it > might be that some mail clients make it difficult to work with. But I > can say it's no problem with pine. I simply index an attachment from > the attachment list. IE: this time I selected a line that said: > ' Message, "Re: Fwd: Please confirm your email for' > Then selected the view function. Since I started the reply while viewing > the message pine took care of the subject line for me and initially > quoted only the one attachment's content... So I'm inclined to think the > better gui mail clients should handle the digest well enough. > > It's just an idea... > -- > | --- ___ > | <0> <-> Joe (theWordy) Philbrook > | ^ > | ~\___/~ > > But if I actually knew everything, then I'd know I was an idiot... > > It would appear that on Mar 29, Steve Buehler did say: > > > I agree, but to fight the amount of spam that goes through is not easy some > > times. The problem with mailing lists like this one is that the from line > > does NOT say it is from the redhat list but instead, the user who sent to > > the redhat list. So they can't put that into their program to allow it to > > come through. I don't use these type of services, but when getting around > > 10,000 emails a day and only about 1,000 are valid for me, it is real tempting. > > > > Steve > > > > At 09:15 AM 3/29/2004, you wrote: > > >AAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH! > > > > > >why do these people insist on using this inane and anoying system when > > >subscribing to mailing lists?????????????? > > > > > >I know I've ranted about this before but it's still annoying. > > - - - - - - - - -< s n i p >- - - - - - - - - - > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 12 > Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 23:44:58 -0500 > From: "Ryan Golhar" <golharam@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: PVM and .Xauthority > To: <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <002f01c417a4$16501940$ad00a8c0@GOLHARMOBILE1> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" > > I'm trying to set up several RedHat EL WS machines to use PVM. All > users who log onto the machines have their home directories mounted from > an NFS share. > > I've set up the ssh-agent to allow me to log in from one machine to > another without prompting for passwords, and all works well. > > Now, when I run pvm and try to add a host, it attempts to connect and I > get the error: > > Rsh/Rhosts Access FAILED - "Warning: No xauth data; using fake > authentication data for X11 forwarding" > > Is this because I have X11 forwarding turned on by default, or is it > something else? I never got this error before when using ssh until now. > If I delete the .Xauthority file and log in again, it gets created and > the error goes away. This only happens when I try to use pvm. Any > ideas? > > > ----- > Ryan Golhar > Computational Biologist > The Informatics Institute at > The University of Medicine & Dentistry of NJ > > Phone: 973-972-5034 > Fax: 973-972-7412 > Email: golharam@xxxxxxxxx > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 13 > Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 22:53:13 -0600 > From: MKlinke <mklinke@xxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: (OT) Mail got blocked because of SORBS/DYNABLOCK > To: techlist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, General Red Hat Linux discussion > list <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <200403312253.13535.mklinke@xxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > On Wednesday 31 March 2004 22:18, Reuben D. Budiardja wrote: > > > No, my SMTP server is not in dial up, it's static. OK, let me try > > to explain my question again. > > > > A friend of mine uses dial-up/cable with his ISP (Bellsouth). He > > uses MS Outlook client. I gave him account on my mail server (has > > static IP, SMTP Auth, IMAP). I told him to put in my mail server > > domain name as the SMTP server when setting up MS Outlook. > > Then, he sent email, he got tagged as RECV_IN_DYNABLOCK. Why? > > > > I use Kmail on my desktop (which is different than the mail > > server), I put in this same mail server domain as my SMTP, and I > > tried sending email to the same address that he tried. My email did > > not trigger any rule. > > > > So that confuses me. If he's using my SMTP server, he should not > > get tagged, regardless of his IP, cause he's using a legit SMTP > > server (which is mine, on static domain). Could someone tell me > > what I am missing? > > > > It's HIS address that is getting tagged as a dial-up. Look at the > first "Received:" header in any of his messages. It will indicate > that his IP address logged into your smtp server. > > Regards, Mike Klinke > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 14 > Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 23:12:13 -0600 > From: "Rodolfo J. Paiz" <rpaiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Fedora or others? > To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <6.0.3.0.0.20040331230358.02474898@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed > > At 22:04 3/31/2004, you wrote: > >I am currently in a dilemma of whether to use Fedora Core 1 or use other > >distribution for my production servers. > > My sincere, personal opinion: use Fedora. > > >I thought it was fortunate that Fedora is there, but I can't trust it > >since it is just a test version. > > Please don't listen to the idiots who say Fedora "is just a test version." > > Fedora Core 1 is exactly what Red Hat Linux 10 would have been. The major > changes are that (1) Red Hat has opened up the development process to the > community and will allow much, much greater participation (with the > accompanying much greater responsibility); (2) the pace of development and > integration of new tools and technologies will be somewhat faster; and (3) > they do not offer nor sell commercial support. > > In the past, some people said Red Hat Linux was too slow to bring in > cutting-edge technology, while others said that progress was too quick and > they needed servers that didn't change for several years. With the split > between Fedora and Red Hat Enterprise Linux, RH attempts to please both > while improving profitability. Red Hat is no use to any of us if they're > broke, right? > > Fedora should be approximately as stable as Red Hat Linux was, if not more > since the whole devel process and many of the Linux tools are more mature. > It is also Open Source, Free (as in "with freedom"), and free (as in "at no > cost"). You are likely to enjoy it just as much, if not more, than you > enjoyed RHL. > > There is too much fear-mongering out there... if you cannot afford to pay > money for a Linux distro, you should be happy with Fedora. You *could* also > look at WBEL or other "rebuilt from SRPMS" copies of Red Hat Enterprise > Linux... those will offer more robustness and stability *if* their > communities can keep up with patches and updates. Whether or not they will > be able to do so is, of course, too early to tell. > > Cheers, > > > -- > Rodolfo J. Paiz > rpaiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://www.simpaticus.com > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 15 > Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 23:31:43 -0600 > From: MKlinke <mklinke@xxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: (OT) Mail got blocked because of SORBS/DYNABLOCK > To: techlist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, General Red Hat Linux discussion > list <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <200403312331.43686.mklinke@xxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > > Below is part of the FAQ from njabl.org. It shows a sample of a > spamassassin configuration. If you query the njabl.org database it > will return one or more of the 127.0.0.x IP address strings if the > address of interest is in the database. For example, to query your > address simply reverse your IP address and type: (x = your real > numbers) > > # host 103.28.xx.xxx.dnsbl.njabl.org > # host 103.28.xx.xxx.dnsbl.sorbs.net (for the sorbs database) > > Notice that you can temper scores base on whether a DUL, OPEN RELAY, > PROXY, or etc. is found within spamassassin. > > Plug your friend's address in to see what happens. > > Regards, Mike Klinke > > ====================== from the njabl.org FAQ ====== > > Our dnsbl can also be used to tag potential spam messages (letting > individual users decide what action to take) using Spamassassin. > After you have Spamassassin properly installed, add the following to > your local.cf, probably /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf: (note: > according to the Spamassassin developers, these rules will only work > with Spamassassin up to version 2.5x and will not work properly with > Spamassassin >= 2.6x) > > header IN_NJABL_ORG rbleval:check_rbl('njabl','dnsbl.njabl.org.') > describe IN_NJABL_ORG Received via a relay in dnsbl.njabl.org > tflags IN_NJABL_ORG net > > header NJABL_OPEN_RELAY rbleval:check_rbl_results_for('njabl', > '127.0.0.2') > describe NJABL_OPEN_RELAY DNSBL: sender is Confirmed Open Relay > tflags NJABL_OPEN_RELAY net > > header NJABL_DUL rbleval:check_rbl_results_for('njabl', > '127.0.0.3') > describe NJABL_DUL DNSBL: sender ip address in in a > dialup block > tflags NJABL_DUL net > > header NJABL_SPAM_SRC rbleval:check_rbl_results_for('njabl', > '127.0.0.4') > describe NJABL_SPAM_SRC DNSBL: sender is Confirmed Spam Source > tflags NJABL_SPAM_SRC net > > header NJABL_MULTI_STAGE rbleval:check_rbl_results_for('njabl', > '127.0.0.5') > describe NJABL_MULTI_STAGE DNSBL: sent through multi-stage open > relay > tflags NJABL_MULTI_STAGE net > > header NJABL_CGI rbleval:check_rbl_results_for('njabl', > '127.0.0.8') > describe NJABL_CGI DNSBL: sender is an open formmail > tflags NJABL_CGI net > > header NJABL_PROXY rbleval:check_rbl_results_for('njabl', > '127.0.0.9') > describe NJABL_PROXY DNSBL: sender is an open proxy > tflags NJABL_PROXY net > > score IN_NJABL_ORG 0.38 > score NJABL_DUL 0.62 > score NJABL_MULTI_STAGE 0.75 > score NJABL_PROXY 3.00 > score NJABL_OPEN_RELAY 3.00 > score NJABL_CGI 1.50 > score NJABL_SPAM_SRC 3.00 > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 16 > Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2004 04:28:11 +0100 > From: "kluu te" <linuxpower@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: USB Printer > To: "General Red Hat Linux discussion list" <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <20040401032811.D9EFC23AB1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Try to put in the printer URI in the print command line in printer share in smb.conf. instead of -Pepson or what your printer is called. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Edward Dekkers <edward@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2004 09:23:02 +0800 > To: edwin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,General Red Hat Linux discussion list <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: USB Printer > > > Edwin Humphries wrote: > > > > > On 31 Mar 2004 at 8:58, Edward Dekkers wrote: > > > > > > > > >>Edwin Humphries wrote: > > >> > > >>>We're trying to share an Epson USB printer via Samba on our new Fedora server. > > > > > > > > >>>The share is set up OK, and can be seen and opened from Windows clients. > > >>>However, although the Fedora box can print to the Epson, the Windows boxes can. > > > > > > > > >>I'm assuming this is a typo, I'm sure you wouldn't be posting if they > > >>can both print OK. > > > > > > > > > Yes, sorry: should read "can't". > > > > > > > > >>>All other Samba shares, including a laser printer connected to the parallel > > >>>port, work fine. > > >>> > > >>>Does anyone have a clue how to fix this? > > > > > > > > >>Please tell us EXACTLY what's happening. Just saying something doesn't > > >>work really isn't good enough to guess what is going wrong. > > > > > > > > > I've checked the port settings on the Epson driver: if I install it from the Epson > > > CD, it's set to LPT1: and can't be changed, so that doesn't work. If I install it > > > from the Add Printer "wizard", the job (usually print test from windows) shows up on > > > the Epson Status Monitor showing a connection error. > > > > OK, forget the status monitor for starters - this is simply not going to > > work over the samba share, as it relies on the Windows driver. Linux > > doesn't have the Windows driver, hence the status monitor is not going > > to work. > > > > I cannot remember EXACTLY what I did to get my C82 working like your > > configuration, but I do remember I had to change something inside the > > cups configuration files to set the cups system to RAW printing mode. > > > > I found the answer on the net at that stage, and since the printer is no > > longer on my server, I cannot give you the exact answer. The reason I > > took it off the server and shared it with a real windows PC instead is > > because the C82 has 4 ink cartridges, yet only 1 ink out indicator. The > > status monitor is the ONLY way to see which ink is out. Really stupid on > > Epson's part, they obviously assumed everybody in the world runs > > Windows, but nothing I can do about it. The earlier printers with 1 > > black, 1 tri-colour DID have 2 ink indicator LEDs, this has only become > > a problem in the recent models. > > > > Just having a look in /etc/cups right now, I've found it again. There's > > two files: mime.types and mime.conv > > > > BOTH have a section in there called RAW printing support. I simply > > un-commented those lines (as instructed in the comments), and hey > > presto, I could print to the Epson. > > > > However - You haven't given us the model of the Epson, but if you have > > less ink indicator LEDs than actual inks inside the printer, you really > > do need the monitor unless someone's written a clever program for Linux > > to monitor this for you. > > > > Regards, > > Ed. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > redhat-list mailing list > > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > -- > _____________________________________________________________ > Web-based SMS services available at http://www.operamail.com. > >From your mailbox to local or overseas cell phones. > > Powered by Outblaze > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 17 > Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 08:19:59 +0100 > From: "Chiu, PCM (Peter) " <P.C.M.Chiu@xxxxxxxx> > Subject: RE: physical memory support under RHEL for Opteron > To: "'Joshua Baker-LePain'" <jlb17@xxxxxxxx>, > "'redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx'" <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: "Chiu, PCM \(Peter\) " <P.C.M.Chiu@xxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: > <49F73BEED865D3119F8700902773C9F903D0EA29@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain > > Many thanks, > > I have also gathered from a couple of vendors that they > have experienced a problem in getting IDE and SATA working > to an opterons with more than 4GB of memory. One theory is that > quite a number of IDE and SATA controllers are still running 32-bit codes. > > Peter > > -----Original Message----- > From: Joshua Baker-LePain [mailto:jlb17@xxxxxxxx] > Sent: 31 March 2004 18:12 > To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Cc: Chiu, PCM (Peter) > Subject: physical memory support under RHEL for Opteron > > > On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 at 12:00pm, redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx wrote > > > I am just about to order an dual Opteron 248 server to run under RHEL > > AS. > > > > I would like to double check the physical memory supported - we are > > getting 8 x 2GB PC3200 or PC2700 memory on this server. > > > > I have found something a bit obscure on the RH web page: > > http://www.redhat.com/software/rhel/as/ > > <http://www.redhat.com/software/rhel/as/> > > > > in that it said: > > > > ** 64GB is the maximum memory size for X86 systems. Maximum memory > > sizes vary with other architectures. > > > > Can anyone confirm > > a. the maximum memory size for Opterons supported, and > > b. the maximum usable physical memory per process on user applications > > >From /usr/src/linux-2.4.21-9.EL/Documentation/x86_64/mm.txt on my RHEL3.0 > AMD64 system: > > The paging design used on the x86-64 linux kernel port in 2.4.x provides: > > o per process virtual address space limit of 512 Gigabytes > o top of userspace stack located at address 0x0000007fffffffff > o start of the kernel mapping = 0x0000010000000000 > o global RAM per system 508*512GB=254 Terabytes > o no need of any common code change > o 512GB of vmalloc/ioremap space > > So I think you're OK with 16GB. ;) FWIW, that systems has 8GB and runs > wonderfully. Be sure to follow the recommendations in bugs 118152 and > 115438, which fix a couple of memory issues. > > -- > Joshua Baker-LePain > Department of Biomedical Engineering > Duke University > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 18 > Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 10:25:31 +0100 > From: Gary Stainburn <gary.stainburn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Fwd: Please confirm your email for brent@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <200404011025.31841.gary.stainburn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > On Thursday 01 April 2004 12:12 am, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote: > > Seams like a lose/lose situation, either the list's contributors get > > pummeled with these very annoying "http://www.MailStation.US"; links. OR > > "http://www.MailStation.US"; users have to give up on an easy anti-spam > > solution. > > There are two problems here. Firstly, I use reply-to-all, because on most > mailing lists, that's the easiest way to ensure that my reply gets back to > the list. However, this means that an email also gets back direct to the > original author - with this direct post being the possible cause. I've > noticed that this list actually changes the reply-to to include the list > address. > > Secondly, MailStation presumably isn't clever enough to check other headers, > such as List-Id, or reply-to. If it checked the reply-to alone, it would > allow the messages through. > > > > > Unless of course there is a simple compromise... Steve says the problem > > is that the "From:" header line doesn't indicate the redhat list? > > Might I suggest that those list users who wish yo use that kind of > > spamblocking subscribe instead to the "Digest" version. Then the actual > > "From:" header would say "redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx" with > > individual subjects embedded in the attachments. If a list user can't do > > without such an inane form of spam protection on the mailbox used to > > subscribe, then I think it's only common courtesy for them to subscribe > > to the version that can be programed into their white list. > > > > Wouldn't that solve the problem? Err of course that is IF and only IF > > you can get the "http://www.MailStation.US"; users to settle for the > > digest... > > > > Granted the "Digest" may take a little getting used to for some. And it > > might be that some mail clients make it difficult to work with. But I > > can say it's no problem with pine. I simply index an attachment from > > the attachment list. IE: this time I selected a line that said: > > ' Message, "Re: Fwd: Please confirm your email for' > > Then selected the view function. Since I started the reply while viewing > > the message pine took care of the subject line for me and initially > > quoted only the one attachment's content... So I'm inclined to think the > > better gui mail clients should handle the digest well enough. > > > > It's just an idea... > > Unfortunately, not every mail client's as good as pine. > > I still think the best but most unlikely solution is to get MailStation to > have more intelligent filters, but until then I'm simply going to send any > posts from them straight into the bit-bucket. > > -- > Gary Stainburn > > This email does not contain private or confidential material as it > may be snooped on by interested government parties for unknown > and undisclosed purposes - Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act, 2000 > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 19 > Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 07:24:09 -0500 > From: "Reuben D. Budiardja" <techlist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: (OT) Mail got blocked because of SORBS/DYNABLOCK > To: mklinke@xxxxxxxx, General Red Hat Linux discussion list > <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <200404010724.09647.techlist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > On Wednesday 31 March 2004 11:53 pm, MKlinke wrote: > > On Wednesday 31 March 2004 22:18, Reuben D. Budiardja wrote: > > > No, my SMTP server is not in dial up, it's static. OK, let me try > > > to explain my question again. > <snip> > > > So that confuses me. If he's using my SMTP server, he should not > > > get tagged, regardless of his IP, cause he's using a legit SMTP > > > server (which is mine, on static domain). Could someone tell me > > > what I am missing? > > > > It's HIS address that is getting tagged as a dial-up. Look at the > > first "Received:" header in any of his messages. It will indicate > > that his IP address logged into your smtp server. > > So, regardless of what SMTP server he uses, he will still be tagged by the > rule ? Well, that's not very nice of SA. > On the other hand, he also has another email account, and sending email from > that other account did not trigger the same rule. If the SA rule is triggered > because of his originating IP address, then it should be triggered whatever > email account or SMTP server that he uses, right ? > > RDB > > -- > Reuben D. Budiardja > Department of Physics and Astronomy > The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN > --------------------------------------------------------- > "To be a nemesis, you have to actively try to destroy > something, don't you? Really, I'm not out to destroy > Microsoft. That will just be a completely unintentional > side effect." > - Linus Torvalds - > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 20 > Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 07:27:21 -0500 > From: "Reuben D. Budiardja" <techlist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: (OT) Mail got blocked because of SORBS/DYNABLOCK > To: mklinke@xxxxxxxx, General Red Hat Linux discussion list > <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <200404010727.21485.techlist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > On Thursday 01 April 2004 12:31 am, MKlinke wrote: > > Below is part of the FAQ from njabl.org. It shows a sample of a > > spamassassin configuration. If you query the njabl.org database it > > will return one or more of the 127.0.0.x IP address strings if the > > address of interest is in the database. For example, to query your > > address simply reverse your IP address and type: (x = your real > > numbers) > > Thanks, but unfortunately, the spamassasin is not mine. It's on yet another > mail server. I found out about this because I have a mail account on that > other mail server, and everytime my friend sends me email there, he got > tagged. This concerns me because he's going to use that mail account as a > businness account. If this happens in general with most SA, it's not good. > > RDB > -- > Reuben D. Budiardja > Department of Physics and Astronomy > The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN > --------------------------------------------------------- > "To be a nemesis, you have to actively try to destroy > something, don't you? Really, I'm not out to destroy > Microsoft. That will just be a completely unintentional > side effect." > - Linus Torvalds - > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 21 > Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 14:38:43 +0200 > From: "John Jacks" <mibsun@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: MAILMAN STRANGE FILES > To: <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <001d01c417e6$44aad5e0$4301d00a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Hi , > In th/var/log/mailman folder ;there are 100's of files like for eg error.4.1.1.1.1.2.1 .Please can anyone suggest why are these files getting created .These all are 0 byte files . > Thanks > mibsun > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: /archives/redhat-list/attachments/20040401/01f96a86/attachment.htm > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 22 > Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 06:47:24 -0600 > From: Ed Wilts <ewilts@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: (OT) Mail got blocked because of SORBS/DYNABLOCK > To: techlist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, General Red Hat Linux discussion > list <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <20040401124724.GC19153@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 07:24:09AM -0500, Reuben D. Budiardja wrote: > > So, regardless of what SMTP server he uses, he will still be tagged by the > > rule ? Well, that's not very nice of SA. > > What he should be doing is sending his e-mail through his ISP's mail > server as I pointed out in an earlier response. That e-mail will be > accepted by the ISP, and if it's then forwarded to your mail server, you > won't trigger the rule because you received the e-mail from the ISP, not > from the original sender. > > The rule only gets triggered based on the SMTP server you received the > e-mail from, not from every SMTP server along the way. > > -- > Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA > mailto:ewilts@xxxxxxxxxx > Member #1, Red Hat Community Ambassador Program > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 23 > Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 08:04:21 -0500 > From: "Reuben D. Budiardja" <techlist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: (OT) Mail got blocked because of SORBS/DYNABLOCK > To: Ed Wilts <ewilts@xxxxxxxxxx>, General Red Hat Linux discussion > list <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <200404010804.21474.techlist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > On Thursday 01 April 2004 07:47 am, Ed Wilts wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 07:24:09AM -0500, Reuben D. Budiardja wrote: > > > So, regardless of what SMTP server he uses, he will still be tagged by > > > the rule ? Well, that's not very nice of SA. > > > > What he should be doing is sending his e-mail through his ISP's mail > > server as I pointed out in an earlier response. > > OK, I'll tell him that. But . . . > > > That e-mail will be > > accepted by the ISP, and if it's then forwarded to your mail server, you > > won't trigger the rule because you received the e-mail from the ISP, not > > from the original sender. > > The rule only gets triggered based on the SMTP server you received the > > e-mail from, not from every SMTP server along the way. > > I still don't understand this quite well. The account that trigger the rule > received the mail from my SMTP server. > I believe this is what happening to the mail relaying: > > a --> B ---> C --- d > > a = my friend home computer, MS Outlook client, set up to use B's domain name > as his SMTP server > B = mail server that *I own*. SMTP relay only with authentication. No SA, just > relay. > C = Another mail server, has SA in it, the one whose rules is triggered > d = my IMAP account in C's mail server > > Now, my friend sent email to my d address, from his a computer. But he's using > B as his SMTP server. So from C's point of view, mail is coming/relayed from > B. B has static IP address, and as far as I can tell, not in any RBL. > When I check my email in my d address, I see that C has tagged my friend > email. > Why would C care if the mail coming from a, and tag it? It should only see > that the mail came from B, and not tag it. > > Thanks a lot for all the help. > > RDB > -- > Reuben D. Budiardja > Department of Physics and Astronomy > The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN > --------------------------------------------------------- > "To be a nemesis, you have to actively try to destroy > something, don't you? Really, I'm not out to destroy > Microsoft. That will just be a completely unintentional > side effect." > - Linus Torvalds - > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 24 > Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 08:42:40 -0500 (EST) > From: Joshua Baker-LePain <jlb17@xxxxxxxx> > Subject: RE: physical memory support under RHEL for Opteron > To: "Chiu, PCM (Peter) " <P.C.M.Chiu@xxxxxxxx> > Cc: "'redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx'" <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0404010839330.26077@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII > > On Thu, 1 Apr 2004 at 8:19am, Chiu, PCM (Peter) wrote > > > I have also gathered from a couple of vendors that they > > have experienced a problem in getting IDE and SATA working > > to an opterons with more than 4GB of memory. One theory is that > > quite a number of IDE and SATA controllers are still running 32-bit codes. > > That system uses the Arima (Rioworks?) HDAMA motherboard, and I've had no > issues with it. > > -- > Joshua Baker-LePain > Department of Biomedical Engineering > Duke University > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 25 > Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 09:08:07 -0500 (EST) > From: "Gerry Doris" <gdoris@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: (OT) Mail got blocked because of SORBS/DYNABLOCK > To: techlist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "General Red Hat Linux discussion > list" <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <38147.129.80.22.143.1080828487.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 > > snip... > > I still don't understand this quite well. The account that trigger the > > rule > > received the mail from my SMTP server. > > I believe this is what happening to the mail relaying: > > > > a --> B ---> C --- d > > > > a = my friend home computer, MS Outlook client, set up to use B's domain > > name > > as his SMTP server > > B = mail server that *I own*. SMTP relay only with authentication. No SA, > > just > > relay. > > C = Another mail server, has SA in it, the one whose rules is triggered > > d = my IMAP account in C's mail server > > > > Now, my friend sent email to my d address, from his a computer. But he's > > using > > B as his SMTP server. So from C's point of view, mail is coming/relayed > > from > > B. B has static IP address, and as far as I can tell, not in any RBL. > > When I check my email in my d address, I see that C has tagged my friend > > email. > > Why would C care if the mail coming from a, and tag it? It should only see > > that the mail came from B, and not tag it. > > > > Thanks a lot for all the help. > > > > RDB > > The entire point of the rule is to prevent A from sending mail directly > from his system. No one cares what servers the mail passes through after > it leaves user A's box. > > This rule has become popular for a couple of reasons: > > 1. many of the folks using cable and DSL modems in dhcp blocks have > misconfigured their servers and are causing grief...often to their ISP's > other users. > > 2. many of the ISP's owning these ip blocks have end user agreements > prohibiting their customers from running servers. These ISP's sometimes > charge for hosting and want to prevent competition from their own users. > > As Ed pointed out, if user A relays through his ISP's email server then > the rule will not be triggered. I have to do exactly this to avoid > triggering the rule at the receiving end. Besides, my ISP is rather anal > about servers on his network. > > > Gerry > > > > > ------------------------------ > > __ > redhat-list mailing list > Unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > End of redhat-list Digest, Vol 2, Issue 1 > ***************************************** > -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
