On Thu, 1 Apr 2004 09:23:19 -0500, Jeff Kinz wrote: > > Reuben, Ed Wilts credibility in this list, on a scale of 1 to 10, is so > close to ten that it is indistinguishable from ten. Please take his > advice. > > On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 08:04:21AM -0500, Reuben D. Budiardja wrote: > > On Thursday 01 April 2004 07:47 am, Ed Wilts wrote: > > > What he should be doing is sending his e-mail through his ISP's mail > > > server as I pointed out in an earlier response. > > > > OK, I'll tell him that. But . . . > > > > I still don't understand this quite well. The account that trigger the rule > > received the mail from my SMTP server. > > I believe this is what happening to the mail relaying: > > > > a --> B ---> C --- d > > > > a = my friend home computer, MS Outlook client, > > (A possible explanation.. ): > Which has A dynamically assigned IP address that is in the block list. > This IP address is recorded in the headers which accompany the email. > the block list filters find it there and wallah! blocked. Same with your message, btw: X-RedHat-Blacklist-Warning: Relay 204.127.202.56 is blacklisted by SORBS X-RedHat-Spam-Score: 2.646 ** It's the same with my messages to lists @redhat.com, except that if I post via my mail provider's SMTP server, the Spam score is much higher than when I post via a local server, which has a blacklisted dynamic IP (~0.8). When I use my provider's server, the SORBS warning goes away, although my dyn IP is still in the first "Received:" header, but the Spam score is increased to ~4. -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
