They're pretty much 6 of one, half dozen the other. If you're doing an upgrade, though, RHL9 doesn't have an upgrade option in the regular installation process. You'll have to specify "linux upgradeany" at the initial boot prompt from the CD. That was the gotcha for me in going from RHL7.1 to RHL9. I don't actually recall if that was the case when I upgraded my RHL7.2 box to FC1...I think there might have been an "upgrade" option in the installer for that. On Tue, 9 Mar 2004, Tom Westheimer wrote: > I was beginning to think the same thing. I am running a small website > and email server and want to run a PHP app for service orders. I have > 10 email users so the question what distro do you think would be the > best with the least hassle? Version 7.3 , version 9 or FC1? > > Mike Burger wrote: > > >I can't help but think that it might be easier to simply upgrade to RH9 or > >FC1. -- Mike Burger http://www.bubbanfriends.org Visit the Dog Pound II BBS telnet://dogpound2.citadel.org or http://dogpound2.citadel.org:2000 To be notified of updates to the web site, visit http://www.bubbanfriends.org/mailman/listinfo/site-update, or send a message to: site-update-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with a message of: subscribe -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
