hmmm freessl.... FreeSSL claims to own all of it Root Certificates (states it on the front page). Then they claim they are a subsidiary of GeoTrust. But their own SSL ceertificate for their website is from http://www.usertrust.com . Which I think is very strange for a CA. I would think they would issue their own SSL certificate, since they claim to own the Root Certificates. Anyone has some inside info? Thanks. Saqib Ali ------------- http://validate.sf.net <---- (X)HTML / DocBook Validator and Transformer On Mon, 8 Mar 2004, AragonX wrote: > Go here: > > http://www.freessl.com/ > > $39.00 for a year and the CA is already on most systems. I've used this > and it works great. > > <quote who="Robert Hartung*"> > > > > Hi all, > > This may be too basic a question but I would like some > > opinions. So here goes: > > > > We are setting up a small web viewer to distribute medical > > x-ray images and reports under SSL. We will be collecting no > > information from the clients. This is a one way street. We > > plan on using SSL, but I wonder if it is necessary to pay > > Verisign US$1600 every two years for their certificate? > > > > Thanks. All input appreciated. > > > > Bob Hartung > > > > > > > > -- > > redhat-list mailing list > > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > > > -- > redhat-list mailing list > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
