--- "Boulytchev, Vasiliy" <vboulytchev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> escribió: > > Ladies and Gents, > Imagine the following scenario. I have Apache > 2.blah running as > nobody.nobody (httpd.conf). Now I have 2 virtual > hosts, sarah and john. > The users and groups are sarah.sarah and john.john. > > My first question, is why can apache serve a file, > whose permissions > are root.root? These are their permisions: -rw-r--r-- > Second, is it safe to have a server setup like the > above, without > jailing? Always it's more safetly using chroot but it's not always necesary, you're giving acces only to two users. It's my opinion... Regards... > > Vasiliy Boulytchev > Colorado Information Technologies, Inc. > http://www.coinfotech.com > > ATTACHMENT part 2 application/x-pkcs7-signature name=smime.p7s ===== -- Manuel Aróstegui Linux user 200896 ___________________________________________________ Yahoo! Messenger - Nueva versión GRATIS Super Webcam, voz, caritas animadas, y más... http://messenger.yahoo.es -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
