Re: Spam Filter

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



You are obviously on top of the situation, Craig. It sounds like you have a
first class system going there. I just wish all sysadmins would take the
time to plan that well!


The only reason I replied to your message was to point out this "gotcha" that
can happen if you use a challenge/response system.  My message and your reply
will end up in the archives where hopefully other admins will discover the
information.

Thanks Barry, I was a little nervous when I implemented it, but I have to say that I am real proud of my mail server, small though it may be. We only have it serving 18 email addresses, for a total of about 16K (16,000) emails a month where about 99% of all the spam gets caught and quarantined. (about 20% of the 16,000 is spam)


Your comment above regarding sysadmins is the number one reason why I moved away from using RBL's directly with Sendmail and into implementing the solution I mentioned earlier. We were getting more and more false positives popping up, and a little investigation proved that in most instances, it was because the RBL maintainer was blacklisting entire netblocks as opposed to using only offending IP's (with seemingly total disregard.)

Craig D.
--
--

Craig Daters (craig@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Systems Administrator
West Press Printing
1663 West Grant Road
Tucson, Arizona 85745-1433

Tel: 520-624-4939
Fax: 520-624-2715

www.westpress.com

--


-- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [Kernel Development]     [PAM]     [Fedora Users]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [Gimp]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Yosemite News]     [Red Hat Crash Utility]


  Powered by Linux