Re: Fate of RedHat

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday 24 February 2004 4:14 am, Ed Wilts wrote:
[snip]
>
> Not have you not looked at pricing, but you haven't looked at the
> product either.  Fedora is not a replacement for Rawhide - it's a
> replacement for Red Hat Linux.  Rawhide continues at it always has.
> Fedora has frozen release cycles - Rawhide does not.

Hello Ed and Rodolfo,

I will hold up my hand and repeat what I said in my OP.  I was voicing an 
opinion I have built up based on what I had heard on this list and others.

I was wrong.

I did not know of the changes to the RHCE scheme (the rant about the term 
'engineer' still stands although that's not aimed at RH specifically).

Based on your two comments I will take a closer look at Fedora and test load 
it (yes I know I should have done that first).

Gary
-- 
Gary Stainburn
 
This email does not contain private or confidential material as it
may be snooped on by interested government parties for unknown
and undisclosed purposes - Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act, 2000     


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [Kernel Development]     [PAM]     [Fedora Users]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [Gimp]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Yosemite News]     [Red Hat Crash Utility]


  Powered by Linux