On Sunday 22 February 2004 07:41 pm, Dave Ihnat wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 02:04:03PM -0500, Reuben D. Budiardja wrote:
<snip>
> If they *do* currently allow unrestricted access to the SRPMs, it may be
> an oversight, and I can't count on it in the future. Blocking access
> to customers who didn't buy the version with that particular package
> bundled into the distro would be very much in line with their attempt to
> add to the revenue stream to support the cost of testing, integration,
> and RPM packaging.
My impression is that the access to SRPMS is not an oversight. Someone
complained in taroon-list that some SRPMS updates are not in the FTP site
(yet). One redhat person replied that _that_ might be an oversight (not
having the SRPMS in FTP) and they're there the next day or so.
RDB
--
Reuben D. Budiardja
Department of Physics and Astronomy
The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN
---------------------------------------------------------
"To be a nemesis, you have to actively try to destroy
something, don't you? Really, I'm not out to destroy
Microsoft. That will just be a completely unintentional
side effect."
- Linus Torvalds -
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
