On February 10, 2004 08:59 pm, Xu Congyuan, Patrick wrote: > Pete Nesbitt wrote: > >On February 10, 2004 06:16 pm, Xu Congyuan, Patrick wrote: > ><snip> > > > >>Feb 9 14:52:35 www insmod: > >>/lib/modules/2.4.21-9.EL/kernel/drivers/parport/parport_pc.o: > >>init_module: Device or resource busy > >>Feb 9 14:52:35 www insmod: Hint: insmod errors can be caused by > >>incorrect module parameters, including invalid IO or IRQ > >>parameters. You may find more information in syslog or the output > >>from dmesg > >>Feb 9 14:52:35 www insmod: > >>/lib/modules/2.4.21-9.EL/kernel/drivers/parport/parport_pc.o: insmod > >>parport_lowlevel failed > > > >I know that crucificator mentioned irq's already, but is your parallel > > port set to irq 5 instead or 7 as expected? > >Have a look in /proc/interupts > > This is the file of /proc/interrupts > > CPU0 > 0: 16491337 XT-PIC timer > 1: 12823 XT-PIC keyboard > 2: 0 XT-PIC cascade > 5: 45637 XT-PIC eth1 > 7: 410 XT-PIC aic7xxx > 8: 1 XT-PIC rtc > 9: 580310 XT-PIC aic7xxx > 10: 69121 XT-PIC usb-ohci, eth0 > 12: 212859 XT-PIC PS/2 Mouse > 14: 2214176 XT-PIC ide0 > NMI: 0 > ERR: > > I dont know much about IRQ... But I just wondering how come the eth1 is > running at 10Mbps halfduplex... Patrick, the 1/2 duplex may be a result of what you are connected to. If eth1 is connected to a shared medium, like a hub, you can only get 1/2 duplex (full duplex implies no collisions), and if the link is 10, not 100Mb, then that would result in 10Mb 1/2 duplex. The irq's appear okay. I'm still curious why the par-port module is failing, probably because the scsi HA is using 7.... and 9(?) Have you tried the nic in a different machine, of even swapping them? -- Pete Nesbitt, rhce -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
