Some of the switches are used as backbone units, while others are W/G switches. Anyway, I will be flushing all the tables etc over the weekend. - Will keep you posted. Regards Enrico ----- Original Message ----- From: "Pete Nesbitt" <pete@xxxxxxxxx> To: <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 4:39 PM Subject: Re: ARP Table wierdness > On November 14, 2003 12:01 am, Enrico Payne wrote: > > Hi Pete, > > > > Thanks for coming back to me. Yes we do have a few switches, but we have > > not moved the devices around (changed ports). > > > > The entry in the arp table looks something like this: > > > > jbpn1 (172.16.128.29) at <incomplete> on eth0 > > > > I mentioned this to someone else, and they also mentioned the possibility > > that the switch was the cause of the problem. > > I'll try and flush the switches/routers and other "intelligent" devices > > this weekend to see if that solves the problem. > > > > Regards > > Enrico > > > > > > If you in there anyway, and particularly if it is a workgroup switch (one MAC > per port), you could try moving the server to a diff port or a diff switch > (don't forget to document:) incase the MAC table is actually broken (may > cause to lose entries etc). > > yikes, late for work.... > -- > Pete Nesbitt, rhce > > > -- > redhat-list mailing list > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- ___________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for viruses. Pharma Natura will not be held responsible for the loss of data or any other loss caused by the use of the information contained in this e-mail. -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
