RE: Alternative for Exchange

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Very nice. Thanks!

Mike


 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
 security@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


-----Original Message-----
From: James Williams [mailto:jwilliams@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 6:33 AM
To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Alternative for Exchange

http://www.opengroupware.org/

James Williams
Network Systems Engineer

-----Original Message-----
From: redhat-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:redhat-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Mike Koponick
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 9:36 AM
To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Alternative for Exchange

Hello, I'm sure this has been talked about previously, but I was looking
for an alternative to MicroSoft Exchange.

I've seen a few options on the web, but thy have a $$$$ amount to them
that's out of the range of my budget. I searched on Freshmeat without
much luck.

Any suggestions?

Thanks!

Mike


 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
 security@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


-----Original Message-----
From: Brett Franck [mailto:bfranck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 10:28 PM
To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: SNMP + MRTG... WTF?

From: "Rodolfo J. Paiz" <rpaiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 8:13 PM
Subject: RE: SNMP + MRTG... WTF?


> First off, it WORKED! Thanks to Brett and Steve for the key pieces of
help.
> Of course, some further questions on the subject for resolution:
>
> At 05:23 10/15/2003, you wrote:
> >You might consider running a less restrictive snmpd until you get
things
> >figured out, try changing the sec.model section to any. i.e.
> >
> >group     MyRWGroup     any     local
> >group     MyROGroup     any      mynetwork
> >
> >Now you can make a v1 or v2c type query.
>
> Based on the error messages (many hundreds of them) which I got from
MRTG
> in the course of testing, it seems like MRTG uses v1 queries.
Nevertheless,
> I set this to "any" as you suggested, which is fine except for two
errors
> in /var/log/messages when snmpd is restarted. Those errors say:
>
> Oct 13 21:11:26 apollo ucd-snmp[22520]: /etc/snmp/snmpd.conf: line 76:
> Error: bad security model "any" should be: v1, v2c or usm - installing
anyway
> Oct 13 21:11:26 apollo ucd-snmp[22520]: /etc/snmp/snmpd.conf: line 77:
> Error: bad security model "any" should be: v1, v2c or usm - installing
anyway
>
> What should I do here to correct this error and make it go away?
>
> Also, three more questions, now directly related to the MRTG output:
>
>          1. "The statistics were last updated... blah, blah... at
which
> time 'apollo.paiz.org' had been up for 2:01:10." The actual uptime is
> around 12 days... where is snmpd/mrtg getting its data, and how can I
make
> sure that it gets the correct data?

This is because the SNMPD module has been up and running  for
2:01:10....snmpd restart will show "System Uptime" of 0:00:01  not the
"timeticks" of the server itself.

>
>          2. I have a screen resolution of 1400x1050 on my notebook,
and
> 1280x1024 on my desktop. The charts seem to be optimized for 640x480
or
> something... they look tiny. Can I either make them larger, or maybe
put
> two interface charts side by side? (This box only has two interfaces,
so
> being able to see both at once would be nice too.)


Can't Help Yah Here.


>
>          3. I have a 256 Kbps link... should I set MaxBytes to exactly
> 32000 or 32768? I know it's for display only, but what is the
_correct_
value?
>



256Kbps = 32KB
See http://www.perfectnetusa.com/kilo.htm





> Thanks again for all the help, guys.
>
>
> -- 
> Rodolfo J. Paiz
> rpaiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> -- 
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [Kernel Development]     [PAM]     [Fedora Users]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [Gimp]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Yosemite News]     [Red Hat Crash Utility]


  Powered by Linux