On Monday 13 October 2003 15:58, Edward Croft wrote: > On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 14:43, David C. Hart wrote: > > I'm trying to get two cards in a server to cooperate. Here's the > > routing table which is slightly abbreviated for display: > > > > Kernel IP routing table > > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Use Iface > > 192.168.0.0 * 255.255.255.0 U eth1 > > 192.168.0.0 * 255.255.255.0 U eth1 > > 169.254.0.0 * 255.255.0.0 U eth1 > > 127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U lo > > default router 0.0.0.0 UG eth1 > > default router 0.0.0.0 UG eth0 > > > > If I'm reading this correctly, network sends are over device eth1. > > I need to change this to eth0 but all attempts at "route del . . ." > > result in an "invalid" modification. I assume that Bind created the > > 169.254.0.0 entry. Ultimately, I want all traffic going out on > > eth0. > > If I read you correctly, all traffic should route through eth0. Check > /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth1. Make sure there is no > GATEWAY line. If there is comment it out or delete it, otherwise that > route will continue to come back. > To delete that route manually, try > route del default dev eth1 > > As far as 169.254, is that net used anywhere on your network? What is > the router's IP? The 169.254..... address is an automatically assigned IP address. See www.zeroconf.org. This feature was added in RH9. See the archives for how to disable it; search for NOZEROCONF. Regards, Mike Klinke -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
