Re: samba and windoze98

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Yes the win98 is in the same workgroup defined in
smb.conf.
Although i've always been able to connect from another
workgroup on prior version of samba (on RH7.1)


--- John Nichel <jnichel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Nathalie Boulos wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I configured samba-2.2.5-10 on RH8 for file
> sharing.
> > Access from win2k and winXP is smooth and with no
> > problem.
> > 
> > Access from win98 gives the following error:
> > 
> > Error 53: The computer name specified in the
> network
> > path cannot bee located. Make sure you are
> specifying
> > the computer name correctly or try again later
> when
> > the remote computer is available.
> > 
> > Prior version of samba, on RH7.1 is accessible
> from
> > win98 with no problem.
> 
> Is the Win98 system in the same workgroup?  Did you
> specify that 
> workgroup in the smb.conf file?
> 
> -- 
> By-Tor.com
> It's all about the Rush
> http://www.by-tor.com
> 
> 
> -- 
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe
>
mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [Kernel Development]     [PAM]     [Fedora Users]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [Gimp]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Yosemite News]     [Red Hat Crash Utility]


  Powered by Linux