And for me, it is just to lure the students to pay for the certifications and students come in the influence that they are going to become an engineer just with little practise on some commands and minor troubleshooting. no job surety with this stuff but yes one is called An certified engineer , ultimately after some moth's of harassment of unemployment students are force to move on. and the purpose is cleared conclusively which is just concerned to generate revenue for brands. Nothing to shock when students will be server with the certificate of Doctor just after clearing some same kind of stuffed ambiguous money making techniques. Let us make upcoming fresh man power aware with such such things just to make Hi-Tech industry for next era not just Engineers. Hair rising thing is we are motivated for open source implementation, are we doing so...???? Sorry if I hurt anybody. On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 7:11 AM, Tom Burke <tomburkeii@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I have a BS in Electrical, an MS in Electrical, and an MS in Systems. I've > been working in the Electronics & Systems Engineering fields for going on > 15 years, now. I cannot *legally* call myself an Engineer, as I've not > taken the PE, either. Bummer, eh? That was something that was impressed > upon me when I took the FE exam, long, long ago. > > I've been thinking about trying for that piece of paper, but it's only > offered every so often in MD. > > My beef, though, is with the "advertising" of things, especially around > here. See, I've been busting hump for all those years becoming an "expert" > in the field of electronics Engineering and complex systems (Systems > Engineering) - including architecting, designing pieces of, tracking > requirements for, writing manuals for, and selling off those systems. And > then I go looking for a new job, and the folks advertising "Systems > Engineer" want me to maintain computers on networks. > > Don't get me wrong, I can do that. Heck, I have done it. But that's not > exactly what a "Systems Engineer" does, in most cases. And you can imagine > that I'd have to take a hefty pay cut to go off and do those things. Great > if I'd decided I wanted to change my career and go off and do those > things. A waste of the hiring company's and my time, otherwise. > > On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 9:08 PM, fred smith > <fredex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > > > On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 08:20:45PM +0100, Gescape wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 21:40 -0500, Dave Ihnat wrote: > > > > Once, long ago--actually, on Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 08:50:17PM > CDT--mark > > (m.roth@xxxxxxxxx) said: > > > > > Gads, but the word "engineer" is horribly overused. > > > > > > > > True. > > > > > > > > > Fun facts: Calling yourself an engineer while not being a licensed > > > > > professional engineer is potentially illegal, as well as can get > you > > in > > > > > deep kim che for misrepresentation. > > > > What about (the many) people such as my wife, who holds two degrees > > in engineering (Aerospace and Mechanical), but has never taken the PE > > exam? Is she an engineer? I'd say she is! > > > > -- > > ---- Fred Smith -- > fredex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx----------------------------- > > "For him who is able to keep you from falling and to present you before > > his > > glorious presence without fault and with great joy--to the only God our > > Savior > > be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, > > before > > all ages, now and forevermore! Amen." > > ----------------------------- Jude 1:24,25 (niv) > > ----------------------------- > > > > -- > > redhat-list mailing list > > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > -- > redhat-list mailing list > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
