Re: Timers not working as expected

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Greg,

Thanks for your response.

> How did you measure the 2500 microsecond interval?

I calculated the number of timers expired per minute and calculated it to
be 2500 microsecond

> Also in kernels prior to 2.6.21 (where you can see the
> CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS kernel config option), you could have some
> conditions depending on system age (clock) and load or scheduler issues,
> where you see these deviations. If you switch to 2.6.21, you should get
> proper high resolution timing and if you combine that with modern (last
> 3 years) hardware, you should really be able to schedule accurately down
> to microsec resolution.

This issue was seen just once and when I reboot the system , timers were
expiring as expected .

Just a wild guess , can this be related to signal handling rather than
timer expiry  ?

Thanks
Ankit

=====-----=====-----=====
Notice: The information contained in this e-mail
message and/or attachments to it may contain 
confidential or privileged information. If you are 
not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, 
review, distribution, printing or copying of the 
information contained in this e-mail message 
and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If 
you have received this communication in error, 
please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and 
immediately and permanently delete the message 
and any attachments. Thank you



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [Kernel Development]     [PAM]     [Fedora Users]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [Gimp]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Yosemite News]     [Red Hat Crash Utility]


  Powered by Linux