Burke, Thomas (ES) wrote: > [mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of m.roth@xxxxxxxxx > Marti, Robert wrote: >>> bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Burke, Thomas (ES) >>> >>> I'm seriously considering upgrading my server to Fedora. All the >>> distros I see, however, tout their "desktopiness." Are they all good >>> to use as a server, or is there one in particular I should use? Or >>> something else, for that matter? I am intrigued by the engineering >>> "spin," and might like to install all that stuff >>> on my server, as well... <snip> > I concur. I would *NEVER* use fedora on a real server - it's bleeding > edge, not leading edge. If uptime is more important than the n33t3st, > c00l3st f38tur3s (esp. when they don't always work), use something that's > behind the times, like RHEL or CentOS. > > Well... The upgrade will be from RH 6.2.... So yeah, I'm not real > concerned with latest & greatest. > > But my uptime has been near 100% over the last 10 years or so... So, why are you even considering it... wait, are do you mean RH 6.2 (10 years old), or RHEL, in which case, I didn't think 6.2 was out, only 6.1? mark -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
