On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 10:28:06PM +0106, John Ogness wrote: > On 2025-02-05, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Would it make sense to put a call to pr_flush() at the beginning of the > >> kernel_power_off() function? I suspect that would take care of much > >> more than just rcutorture. > >> > >> Or maybe after the pr_emerg("Power down\n"), since that is normally > >> the last thing that shows up on rcutorture's console logs. > > Yes, after the pr_emerg("Power down\n"), as in your patch below. > > > And that does the trick! I specified 500ms, but maybe -1 would be > > better? You tell me! ;-) > > I probably would have chosen 1000ms, but if the kthread has made no > forward progress after a few max timeslices, it probably is dead or will > not be scheduled anyway. I picked 500ms randomly, so I am happy to make it be 1000ms. > If there is no backlog, pr_flush() returns immediately. OK, so I don't need to add "if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT))" to guard it, then? > I recommend _not_ using timeout_ms=-1 here, in case the kthread cannot > be scheduled (for whatever reason). Sounds eminently reasonable to me! > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > commit 172b692a79ec5801eab57cb55d2f9c398f244c62 > > Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Wed Feb 5 12:27:23 2025 -0800 > > > > printk: Flush console log from kernel_power_off() > > > > Kernels built with CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT=y can lose significant console output > > and shutdown time, which hides shutdown-time RCU issues from rcutorture. > > Therefore, make pr_flush() public and invoke it after then last print > > in kernel_power_off(). > > > > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: John Ogness <john.ogness@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/printk.h b/include/linux/printk.h > > index 4217a9f412b2..b3e88ff1ecc3 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/printk.h > > +++ b/include/linux/printk.h > > @@ -806,4 +806,6 @@ static inline void print_hex_dump_debug(const char *prefix_str, int prefix_type, > > #define print_hex_dump_bytes(prefix_str, prefix_type, buf, len) \ > > print_hex_dump_debug(prefix_str, prefix_type, 16, 1, buf, len, true) > > > > + > > +bool pr_flush(int timeout_ms, bool reset_on_progress); > > This will fail to link for !CONFIG_PRINTK. > > In kernel/printk/printk.c currently there is: > > #ifdef CONFIG_PRINTK > static bool pr_flush(int timeout_ms, bool reset_on_progress); > #else > static bool pr_flush(int timeout_ms, bool reset_on_progress) { return true; } > #endif > > This would need to move to include/linux/printk.h > > There you will find an existing CONFIG_PRINTK if/else block to move > those to. Thank you, will do! > > #endif > > diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c > > index 80910bc3470c..e0c6e5a99897 100644 > > --- a/kernel/printk/printk.c > > +++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c > > @@ -2461,7 +2461,7 @@ asmlinkage __visible int _printk(const char *fmt, ...) > > } > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(_printk); > > > > -static bool pr_flush(int timeout_ms, bool reset_on_progress); > > +bool pr_flush(int timeout_ms, bool reset_on_progress); > > static bool __pr_flush(struct console *con, int timeout_ms, bool reset_on_progress); > > > > #else /* CONFIG_PRINTK */ > > @@ -4466,7 +4466,7 @@ static bool __pr_flush(struct console *con, int timeout_ms, bool reset_on_progre > > * Context: Process context. May sleep while acquiring console lock. > > * Return: true if all usable printers are caught up. > > */ > > -static bool pr_flush(int timeout_ms, bool reset_on_progress) > > +bool pr_flush(int timeout_ms, bool reset_on_progress) > > { > > return __pr_flush(NULL, timeout_ms, reset_on_progress); > > } > > diff --git a/kernel/reboot.c b/kernel/reboot.c > > index a701000bab34..3448e6ae3556 100644 > > --- a/kernel/reboot.c > > +++ b/kernel/reboot.c > > @@ -704,6 +704,7 @@ void kernel_power_off(void) > > migrate_to_reboot_cpu(); > > syscore_shutdown(); > > pr_emerg("Power down\n"); > > + pr_flush(500, 1); > > I would have chosen: > > pr_flush(1000, true); > > but I really don't have an argument either way. Hey, of the two of us, you are the printk() expert, so I will make it be 1000. ;-) Thanx, Paul > > kmsg_dump(KMSG_DUMP_SHUTDOWN); > > machine_power_off(); > > } > > John Ogness