Le Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 11:49:49AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney a écrit :
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcu.h b/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
> index 2f9c9272cd486..d2a91f705a4ab 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
> @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ static inline bool rcu_seq_done_exact(unsigned long *sp, unsigned long s)
> {
> unsigned long cur_s = READ_ONCE(*sp);
>
> - return ULONG_CMP_GE(cur_s, s) || ULONG_CMP_LT(cur_s, s - (2 * RCU_SEQ_STATE_MASK + 1));
> + return ULONG_CMP_GE(cur_s, s) || ULONG_CMP_LT(cur_s, s - (3 * RCU_SEQ_STATE_MASK + 1));
This might need a comment.
The way I understand it is that rcu_state.gp_seq might be seen started while
root_rnp->gp_seq is not. So rcu_seq_snap() on the started rcu_state.gp_seq
may return maximum 2 full GPs ahead of root_rnp->gp_seq. And therefore it takes below
2 GPs to safely deduce we wrapped around.
Should it be ULONG_CMP_LT(cur_s, s - (2 * (RCU_SEQ_STATE_MASK + 1))) ?
Or am I missing something?
Thanks.
