Re: [PATCH v7 07/16] rust: add `io::{Io, IoRaw}` base types

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/16/25 11:31 AM, Fiona Behrens wrote:
On 19 Dec 2024, at 18:04, Danilo Krummrich wrote:

+impl<const SIZE: usize> Io<SIZE> {
+    /// Converts an `IoRaw` into an `Io` instance, providing the accessors to the MMIO mapping.
+    ///
+    /// # Safety
+    ///
+    /// Callers must ensure that `addr` is the start of a valid I/O mapped memory region of size
+    /// `maxsize`.
+    pub unsafe fn from_raw(raw: &IoRaw<SIZE>) -> &Self {
+        // SAFETY: `Io` is a transparent wrapper around `IoRaw`.
+        unsafe { &*core::ptr::from_ref(raw).cast() }
+    }
+
+    /// Returns the base address of this mapping.
+    #[inline]
+    pub fn addr(&self) -> usize {
+        self.0.addr()
+    }
+
+    /// Returns the maximum size of this mapping.
+    #[inline]
+    pub fn maxsize(&self) -> usize {
+        self.0.maxsize()
+    }
+
+    #[inline]
+    const fn offset_valid<U>(offset: usize, size: usize) -> bool {
+        let type_size = core::mem::size_of::<U>();
+        if let Some(end) = offset.checked_add(type_size) {
+            end <= size && offset % type_size == 0
+        } else {
+            false
+        }
+    }
+
+    #[inline]
+    fn io_addr<U>(&self, offset: usize) -> Result<usize> {
+        if !Self::offset_valid::<U>(offset, self.maxsize()) {
+            return Err(EINVAL);
+        }
+
+        // Probably no need to check, since the safety requirements of `Self::new` guarantee that
+        // this can't overflow.
+        self.addr().checked_add(offset).ok_or(EINVAL)
+    }
+
+    #[inline]
+    fn io_addr_assert<U>(&self, offset: usize) -> usize {
+        build_assert!(Self::offset_valid::<U>(offset, SIZE));
+
+        self.addr() + offset
+    }

Currently reworking the portmem abstractions I wrote for the LED/SE10 driver.
Right now I’m wondering if it would make sense to move the 3 functions above (`offset_valid`, `io_addr` and `io_addr_assert` into IoRaw),
as I’m considering reusing the IoRaw in the portmem and then just offer the outb/outw/outl functions on a wraping type around IoRaw.
For this I would also use the same functions to check bounds.

Sure, feel free to move them. I think I should have moved those functions to
IoRaw from the get-go.

- Danilo




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux