Re: One-off rcu_nocb_rdp_deoffload bug

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 05, 2024 at 08:41:02PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Le Thu, Sep 05, 2024 at 08:32:16PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker a écrit :
> > Le Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 06:52:36AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney a écrit :
> > > > Yes, I'm preparing an update for the offending patch (which has one more
> > > > embarassing issue while I'm going through it again).
> > > 
> > > Very good, thank you!
> > 
> > So my proposal for a replacement patch is this (to replace the patch
> > of the same name in Neeraj tree):
> 
> FYI, the diffstat against the previous version of the same patch is as follows.
> The rationale being:
> 
> 1) rdp->nocb_cb_kthread doesn't need to be protected by nocb_gp_kthread_mutex
> 
> 2) Once rcuoc is parked, we really _must_ observe the callback list counter decremented
>    after the barrier's completion.
> 
> 3) This fixes another issue: rcuoc must be parked _before_
>    rcu_nocb_queue_toggle_rdp() is called, otherwise a nocb locked sequence
>    within rcuoc would race with rcuog clearing SEGCBLIST_OFFLOADED concurrently,
>    leaving the nocb locked forever.

Thank you!!!

Just to make sure that I understand, I apply this patch on top of
Neeraj's current set of branches to get the fix, correct?

							Thanx, Paul

> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> index 755ada098035..97b99cd06923 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> @@ -1056,6 +1056,13 @@ static int rcu_nocb_rdp_deoffload(struct rcu_data *rdp)
>  	/* Flush all callbacks from segcblist and bypass */
>  	rcu_barrier();
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Make sure the rcuoc kthread isn't in the middle of a nocb locked
> +	 * sequence while offloading is deactivated, along with nocb locking.
> +	 */
> +	if (rdp->nocb_cb_kthread)
> +		kthread_park(rdp->nocb_cb_kthread);
> +
>  	rcu_nocb_lock_irqsave(rdp, flags);
>  	WARN_ON_ONCE(rcu_cblist_n_cbs(&rdp->nocb_bypass));
>  	WARN_ON_ONCE(rcu_segcblist_n_cbs(&rdp->cblist));
> @@ -1064,13 +1071,11 @@ static int rcu_nocb_rdp_deoffload(struct rcu_data *rdp)
>  	wake_gp = rcu_nocb_queue_toggle_rdp(rdp);
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&rdp_gp->nocb_gp_kthread_mutex);
> +
>  	if (rdp_gp->nocb_gp_kthread) {
>  		if (wake_gp)
>  			wake_up_process(rdp_gp->nocb_gp_kthread);
>  
> -		if (rdp->nocb_cb_kthread)
> -			kthread_park(rdp->nocb_cb_kthread);
> -
>  		swait_event_exclusive(rdp->nocb_state_wq,
>  				      rcu_nocb_rdp_deoffload_wait_cond(rdp));
>  	} else {




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux