Re: [PATCH v2] srcu: faster gp seq wrap-around

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 04:23:24PM -0700, JP Kobryn wrote:
> Using a higher value for the initial gp sequence counters allows for
> wrapping to occur faster. It can help with surfacing any issues that may
> be happening as a result of the wrap around.
> 
> Signed-off-by: JP Kobryn <inwardvessel@xxxxxxxxx>

Much nicer, thank you!

Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
>  kernel/rcu/srcutree.c | 10 +++++++---
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
> index bc4b58b0204e..907c4a484503 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,9 @@
>  #include "rcu.h"
>  #include "rcu_segcblist.h"
>  
> +/* Start with a gp sequence value that allows wrapping to occur faster. */
> +#define SRCU_GP_SEQ_INITIAL_VAL ((0UL - 100UL) << RCU_SEQ_CTR_SHIFT)
> +
>  /* Holdoff in nanoseconds for auto-expediting. */
>  #define DEFAULT_SRCU_EXP_HOLDOFF (25 * 1000)
>  static ulong exp_holdoff = DEFAULT_SRCU_EXP_HOLDOFF;
> @@ -247,7 +250,7 @@ static int init_srcu_struct_fields(struct srcu_struct *ssp, bool is_static)
>  	mutex_init(&ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_cb_mutex);
>  	mutex_init(&ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_gp_mutex);
>  	ssp->srcu_idx = 0;
> -	ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_gp_seq = 0;
> +	ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_gp_seq = SRCU_GP_SEQ_INITIAL_VAL;
>  	ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_barrier_seq = 0;
>  	mutex_init(&ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_barrier_mutex);
>  	atomic_set(&ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_barrier_cpu_cnt, 0);
> @@ -258,7 +261,7 @@ static int init_srcu_struct_fields(struct srcu_struct *ssp, bool is_static)
>  	if (!ssp->sda)
>  		goto err_free_sup;
>  	init_srcu_struct_data(ssp);
> -	ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_gp_seq_needed_exp = 0;
> +	ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_gp_seq_needed_exp = SRCU_GP_SEQ_INITIAL_VAL;
>  	ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_last_gp_end = ktime_get_mono_fast_ns();
>  	if (READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_size_state) == SRCU_SIZE_SMALL && SRCU_SIZING_IS_INIT()) {
>  		if (!init_srcu_struct_nodes(ssp, GFP_ATOMIC))
> @@ -266,7 +269,8 @@ static int init_srcu_struct_fields(struct srcu_struct *ssp, bool is_static)
>  		WRITE_ONCE(ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_size_state, SRCU_SIZE_BIG);
>  	}
>  	ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_ssp = ssp;
> -	smp_store_release(&ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_gp_seq_needed, 0); /* Init done. */
> +	smp_store_release(&ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_gp_seq_needed,
> +			SRCU_GP_SEQ_INITIAL_VAL); /* Init done. */
>  	return 0;
>  
>  err_free_sda:
> -- 
> 2.45.2
> 




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux