Re: [PATCH v2] rcu-tasks: Fix access non-existent percpu rtpcp variable in rcu_tasks_need_gpcb()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>
> For kernels built with CONFIG_FORCE_NR_CPUS=y, the nr_cpu_ids is
> defined as NR_CPUS instead of the number of possible cpus, this
> will cause the following system panic:
>
> [    0.015349][    T0] smpboot: Allowing 4 CPUs, 0 hotplug CPUs
> ...
> [    0.021342][    T0] setup_percpu: NR_CPUS:512 nr_cpumask_bits:512 nr_cpu_ids:512 nr_node_ids:1
> ...
> [    3.681252][   T15] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffffff9911c8c8
> [    3.689415][   T45] ehci-pci 0000:00:1a.0: debug port 2
> [    3.697008][   T15] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
> [    3.697009][   T15] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
> [    3.706233][   T45] ehci-pci 0000:00:1a.0: irq 16, io mem 0xf7e3c000
> [    3.708152][   T15] PGD 40fa24067 P4D 40fa24067 PUD 40fa25063 PMD 410bff063
> [    3.720380][   T45] ehci-pci 0000:00:1a.0: USB 2.0 started, EHCI 1.00
> [    3.720430][   T15] PTE 800ffffbefee3062
> [    3.720431][   T15] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
> [    3.727873][   T45] usb usb2: New USB device found, idVendor=1d6b, idProduct=0002, bcdDevice= 6.06
> [    3.734009][   T15] CPU: 0 PID: 15 Comm: rcu_tasks_trace Tainted: G W          6.6.21 #1 5dc7acf91a5e8e9ac9dcfc35bee0245691283ea6
> [    3.734011][   T15] Hardware name: Dell Inc. OptiPlex 9020/005T15, BIOS A14 09/14/2015
> [    3.734012][   T15] RIP: 0010:rcu_tasks_need_gpcb+0x25d/0x2c0
> [    3.737962][   T45] usb usb2: New USB device strings: Mfr=3, Product=2, SerialNumber=1
> [    3.742877][   T15] RSP: 0018:ffffa371c00a3e60 EFLAGS: 00010082
> [    3.751891][   T45] usb usb2: Product: EHCI Host Controller
> [    3.764495][   T15]
> [    3.764496][   T15] RAX: ffffffff98929ca0 RBX: ffffffff98b3b328 RCX: 0000000000021880
> [    3.764497][   T15] RDX: ffffffff9911c880 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000
> [    3.772461][   T45] usb usb2: Manufacturer: Linux 6.6.21 ehci_hcd
> [    3.778248][   T15] RBP: 0000000000000202 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
> [    3.778249][   T15] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000003
> [    3.778249][   T15] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: ffffffff98b3b320
> [    3.786216][   T45] usb usb2: SerialNumber: 0000:00:1a.0
> [    3.805811][   T15] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8c781ea00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> [    3.805813][   T15] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> [    3.811993][   T45] hub 2-0:1.0: USB hub found
> [    3.817383][   T15] CR2: ffffffff9911c8c8 CR3: 000000040fa20005 CR4: 00000000001706f0
> [    3.817385][   T15] Call Trace:
> [    3.817386][   T15]  <TASK>
> [    3.817388][   T15]  ? __die+0x23/0x80
> [    3.819643][   T45] hub 2-0:1.0: 2 ports detected
> [    3.827481][   T15]  ? page_fault_oops+0xa4/0x180
> [    3.827485][   T15]  ? exc_page_fault+0x152/0x180
> [    3.922376][   T15]  ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x40
> [    3.927289][   T15]  ? rcu_tasks_need_gpcb+0x25d/0x2c0
> [    3.932459][   T15]  ? __pfx_rcu_tasks_kthread+0x40/0x40
> [    3.937806][   T15]  rcu_tasks_one_gp+0x69/0x180
> [    3.942451][   T15]  rcu_tasks_kthread+0x94/0xc0
> [    3.947096][   T15]  kthread+0xe8/0x140
> [    3.950956][   T15]  ? __pfx_kthread+0x40/0x40
> [    3.955425][   T15]  ret_from_fork+0x34/0x80
> [    3.959721][   T15]  ? __pfx_kthread+0x40/0x40
> [    3.964192][   T15]  ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x80
> [    3.968841][   T15]  </TASK>
>
> Consider that there may be holes in the CPU numbers, this commit
> use the maxcpu variable to store the CPU numbers after traversing
> possible cpu, and generate the rcu_task_cpu_ids variable and assign
> it to (maxcpu +1) instead of nr_cpu_ids.

Hi, Paul

Any suggestions for this modification?

The warning of objtools is unique to the loongarch64 platform.
A similar problem also occurred at this link:
https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202406211339.BCuCbD2g-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/

Tiezhu recommends updating compiler toolchain before this, or
apply the following patch:
https://lore.kernel.org/loongarch/20240604150741.30252-1-xry111@xxxxxxxxxxx/
however, this patch was not discussed subsequently.

Thanks
Zqiang






>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-input/CALMA0xaTSMN+p4xUXkzrtR5r6k7hgoswcaXx7baR_z9r5jjskw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#u
> Reported-by: Zhixu Liu <zhixu.liu@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  kernel/rcu/tasks.h | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
> index e362f72bb65d..22310965acc7 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
> @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ struct rcu_tasks_percpu {
>         struct list_head rtp_blkd_tasks;
>         struct list_head rtp_exit_list;
>         int cpu;
> +       int index;
>         struct rcu_tasks *rtpp;
>  };
>
> @@ -110,6 +111,7 @@ struct rcu_tasks {
>         call_rcu_func_t call_func;
>         unsigned int wait_state;
>         struct rcu_tasks_percpu __percpu *rtpcpu;
> +       struct rcu_tasks_percpu **rtpcp_array;
>         int percpu_enqueue_shift;
>         int percpu_enqueue_lim;
>         int percpu_dequeue_lim;
> @@ -182,6 +184,8 @@ module_param(rcu_task_collapse_lim, int, 0444);
>  static int rcu_task_lazy_lim __read_mostly = 32;
>  module_param(rcu_task_lazy_lim, int, 0444);
>
> +static int rcu_task_cpu_ids;
> +
>  /* RCU tasks grace-period state for debugging. */
>  #define RTGS_INIT               0
>  #define RTGS_WAIT_WAIT_CBS      1
> @@ -245,6 +249,8 @@ static void cblist_init_generic(struct rcu_tasks *rtp)
>         int cpu;
>         int lim;
>         int shift;
> +       int maxcpu;
> +       int index = 0;
>
>         if (rcu_task_enqueue_lim < 0) {
>                 rcu_task_enqueue_lim = 1;
> @@ -254,14 +260,9 @@ static void cblist_init_generic(struct rcu_tasks *rtp)
>         }
>         lim = rcu_task_enqueue_lim;
>
> -       if (lim > nr_cpu_ids)
> -               lim = nr_cpu_ids;
> -       shift = ilog2(nr_cpu_ids / lim);
> -       if (((nr_cpu_ids - 1) >> shift) >= lim)
> -               shift++;
> -       WRITE_ONCE(rtp->percpu_enqueue_shift, shift);
> -       WRITE_ONCE(rtp->percpu_dequeue_lim, lim);
> -       smp_store_release(&rtp->percpu_enqueue_lim, lim);
> +       rtp->rtpcp_array = kcalloc(num_possible_cpus(), sizeof(struct rcu_tasks_percpu *), GFP_KERNEL);
> +       BUG_ON(!rtp->rtpcp_array);
> +
>         for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>                 struct rcu_tasks_percpu *rtpcp = per_cpu_ptr(rtp->rtpcpu, cpu);
>
> @@ -273,14 +274,29 @@ static void cblist_init_generic(struct rcu_tasks *rtp)
>                 INIT_WORK(&rtpcp->rtp_work, rcu_tasks_invoke_cbs_wq);
>                 rtpcp->cpu = cpu;
>                 rtpcp->rtpp = rtp;
> +               rtpcp->index = index;
> +               rtp->rtpcp_array[index] = rtpcp;
> +               index++;
>                 if (!rtpcp->rtp_blkd_tasks.next)
>                         INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rtpcp->rtp_blkd_tasks);
>                 if (!rtpcp->rtp_exit_list.next)
>                         INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rtpcp->rtp_exit_list);
> +               maxcpu = cpu;
>         }
>
> -       pr_info("%s: Setting shift to %d and lim to %d rcu_task_cb_adjust=%d.\n", rtp->name,
> -                       data_race(rtp->percpu_enqueue_shift), data_race(rtp->percpu_enqueue_lim), rcu_task_cb_adjust);
> +       rcu_task_cpu_ids = maxcpu + 1;
> +       if (lim > rcu_task_cpu_ids)
> +               lim = rcu_task_cpu_ids;
> +       shift = ilog2(rcu_task_cpu_ids / lim);
> +       if (((rcu_task_cpu_ids - 1) >> shift) >= lim)
> +               shift++;
> +       WRITE_ONCE(rtp->percpu_enqueue_shift, shift);
> +       WRITE_ONCE(rtp->percpu_dequeue_lim, lim);
> +       smp_store_release(&rtp->percpu_enqueue_lim, lim);
> +
> +       pr_info("%s: Setting shift to %d and lim to %d rcu_task_cb_adjust=%d rcu_task_cpu_ids=%d.\n",
> +                       rtp->name, data_race(rtp->percpu_enqueue_shift), data_race(rtp->percpu_enqueue_lim),
> +                       rcu_task_cb_adjust, rcu_task_cpu_ids);
>  }
>
>  // Compute wakeup time for lazy callback timer.
> @@ -348,7 +364,7 @@ static void call_rcu_tasks_generic(struct rcu_head *rhp, rcu_callback_t func,
>                         rtpcp->rtp_n_lock_retries = 0;
>                 }
>                 if (rcu_task_cb_adjust && ++rtpcp->rtp_n_lock_retries > rcu_task_contend_lim &&
> -                   READ_ONCE(rtp->percpu_enqueue_lim) != nr_cpu_ids)
> +                   READ_ONCE(rtp->percpu_enqueue_lim) != rcu_task_cpu_ids)
>                         needadjust = true;  // Defer adjustment to avoid deadlock.
>         }
>         // Queuing callbacks before initialization not yet supported.
> @@ -368,10 +384,10 @@ static void call_rcu_tasks_generic(struct rcu_head *rhp, rcu_callback_t func,
>         raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rtpcp, flags);
>         if (unlikely(needadjust)) {
>                 raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rtp->cbs_gbl_lock, flags);
> -               if (rtp->percpu_enqueue_lim != nr_cpu_ids) {
> +               if (rtp->percpu_enqueue_lim != rcu_task_cpu_ids) {
>                         WRITE_ONCE(rtp->percpu_enqueue_shift, 0);
> -                       WRITE_ONCE(rtp->percpu_dequeue_lim, nr_cpu_ids);
> -                       smp_store_release(&rtp->percpu_enqueue_lim, nr_cpu_ids);
> +                       WRITE_ONCE(rtp->percpu_dequeue_lim, rcu_task_cpu_ids);
> +                       smp_store_release(&rtp->percpu_enqueue_lim, rcu_task_cpu_ids);
>                         pr_info("Switching %s to per-CPU callback queuing.\n", rtp->name);
>                 }
>                 raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rtp->cbs_gbl_lock, flags);
> @@ -481,7 +497,7 @@ static int rcu_tasks_need_gpcb(struct rcu_tasks *rtp)
>         if (rcu_task_cb_adjust && ncbs <= rcu_task_collapse_lim) {
>                 raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rtp->cbs_gbl_lock, flags);
>                 if (rtp->percpu_enqueue_lim > 1) {
> -                       WRITE_ONCE(rtp->percpu_enqueue_shift, order_base_2(nr_cpu_ids));
> +                       WRITE_ONCE(rtp->percpu_enqueue_shift, order_base_2(rcu_task_cpu_ids));
>                         smp_store_release(&rtp->percpu_enqueue_lim, 1);
>                         rtp->percpu_dequeue_gpseq = get_state_synchronize_rcu();
>                         gpdone = false;
> @@ -496,7 +512,9 @@ static int rcu_tasks_need_gpcb(struct rcu_tasks *rtp)
>                         pr_info("Completing switch %s to CPU-0 callback queuing.\n", rtp->name);
>                 }
>                 if (rtp->percpu_dequeue_lim == 1) {
> -                       for (cpu = rtp->percpu_dequeue_lim; cpu < nr_cpu_ids; cpu++) {
> +                       for (cpu = rtp->percpu_dequeue_lim; cpu < rcu_task_cpu_ids; cpu++) {
> +                               if (!cpu_possible(cpu))
> +                                       continue;
>                                 struct rcu_tasks_percpu *rtpcp = per_cpu_ptr(rtp->rtpcpu, cpu);
>
>                                 WARN_ON_ONCE(rcu_segcblist_n_cbs(&rtpcp->cblist));
> @@ -511,30 +529,32 @@ static int rcu_tasks_need_gpcb(struct rcu_tasks *rtp)
>  // Advance callbacks and invoke any that are ready.
>  static void rcu_tasks_invoke_cbs(struct rcu_tasks *rtp, struct rcu_tasks_percpu *rtpcp)
>  {
> -       int cpu;
> -       int cpunext;
>         int cpuwq;
>         unsigned long flags;
>         int len;
> +       int index;
>         struct rcu_head *rhp;
>         struct rcu_cblist rcl = RCU_CBLIST_INITIALIZER(rcl);
>         struct rcu_tasks_percpu *rtpcp_next;
>
> -       cpu = rtpcp->cpu;
> -       cpunext = cpu * 2 + 1;
> -       if (cpunext < smp_load_acquire(&rtp->percpu_dequeue_lim)) {
> -               rtpcp_next = per_cpu_ptr(rtp->rtpcpu, cpunext);
> -               cpuwq = rcu_cpu_beenfullyonline(cpunext) ? cpunext : WORK_CPU_UNBOUND;
> -               queue_work_on(cpuwq, system_wq, &rtpcp_next->rtp_work);
> -               cpunext++;
> -               if (cpunext < smp_load_acquire(&rtp->percpu_dequeue_lim)) {
> -                       rtpcp_next = per_cpu_ptr(rtp->rtpcpu, cpunext);
> -                       cpuwq = rcu_cpu_beenfullyonline(cpunext) ? cpunext : WORK_CPU_UNBOUND;
> +       index = rtpcp->index * 2 + 1;
> +       if (index < num_possible_cpus()) {
> +               rtpcp_next = rtp->rtpcp_array[index];
> +               if (rtpcp_next->cpu < smp_load_acquire(&rtp->percpu_dequeue_lim)) {
> +                       cpuwq = rcu_cpu_beenfullyonline(rtpcp_next->cpu) ? rtpcp_next->cpu : WORK_CPU_UNBOUND;
>                         queue_work_on(cpuwq, system_wq, &rtpcp_next->rtp_work);
> +                       index++;
> +                       if (index < num_possible_cpus()) {
> +                               rtpcp_next = rtp->rtpcp_array[index];
> +                               if (rtpcp_next->cpu < smp_load_acquire(&rtp->percpu_dequeue_lim)) {
> +                                       cpuwq = rcu_cpu_beenfullyonline(rtpcp_next->cpu) ? rtpcp_next->cpu : WORK_CPU_UNBOUND;
> +                                       queue_work_on(cpuwq, system_wq, &rtpcp_next->rtp_work);
> +                               }
> +                       }
>                 }
>         }
>
> -       if (rcu_segcblist_empty(&rtpcp->cblist) || !cpu_possible(cpu))
> +       if (rcu_segcblist_empty(&rtpcp->cblist))
>                 return;
>         raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rtpcp, flags);
>         rcu_segcblist_advance(&rtpcp->cblist, rcu_seq_current(&rtp->tasks_gp_seq));
> --
> 2.17.1
>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux