On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 02:05:30AM -0300, Leonardo Bras wrote: > On Tue, Jun 04, 2024 at 03:23:52PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > If a CPU is running either a userspace application or a guest OS in > > nohz_full mode, it is possible for a system call to occur just as an > > RCU grace period is starting. If that CPU also has the scheduling-clock > > tick enabled for any reason (such as a second runnable task), and if the > > system was booted with rcutree.use_softirq=0, then RCU can add insult to > > injury by awakening that CPU's rcuc kthread, resulting in yet another > > task and yet more OS jitter due to switching to that task, running it, > > and switching back. > > > > In addition, in the common case where that system call is not of > > excessively long duration, awakening the rcuc task is pointless. > > This pointlessness is due to the fact that the CPU will enter an extended > > quiescent state upon returning to the userspace application or guest OS. > > In this case, the rcuc kthread cannot do anything that the main RCU > > grace-period kthread cannot do on its behalf, at least if it is given > > a few additional milliseconds (for example, given the time duration > > specified by rcutexperiementationree.jiffies_till_first_fqs, give or take > > scheduling > > delays). > > > > This commit therefore adds a rcutree.nocb_patience_delay kernel boot > > parameter that specifies the grace period age (in milliseconds) > > before which RCU will refrain from awakening the rcuc kthread. > > Preliminary experiementation suggests a value of 1000, that is, > > Just a nit I found when cherry-picking here > s/experiementation/experimentation/ Good eyes! I will fix this on my next rebase, thank you! Thanx, Paul > Thanks! > Leo > > > one second. Increasing rcutree.nocb_patience_delay will increase > > grace-period latency and in turn increase memory footprint, so systems > > with constrained memory might choose a smaller value. Systems with > > less-aggressive OS-jitter requirements might choose the default value > > of zero, which keeps the traditional immediate-wakeup behavior, thus > > avoiding increases in grace-period latency. > > > > [ paulmck: Apply Leonardo Bras feedback. ] > > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240328171949.743211-1-leobras@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > Reported-by: Leonardo Bras <leobras@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Suggested-by: Leonardo Bras <leobras@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Leonardo Bras <leobras@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 8 ++++++++ > > kernel/rcu/tree.c | 10 ++++++++-- > > kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 10 ++++++++++ > > 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt > > index 500cfa7762257..2d4a512cf1fc6 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt > > +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt > > @@ -5018,6 +5018,14 @@ > > the ->nocb_bypass queue. The definition of "too > > many" is supplied by this kernel boot parameter. > > > > + rcutree.nocb_patience_delay= [KNL] > > + On callback-offloaded (rcu_nocbs) CPUs, avoid > > + disturbing RCU unless the grace period has > > + reached the specified age in milliseconds. > > + Defaults to zero. Large values will be capped > > + at five seconds. All values will be rounded down > > + to the nearest value representable by jiffies. > > + > > rcutree.qhimark= [KNL] > > Set threshold of queued RCU callbacks beyond which > > batch limiting is disabled. > > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c > > index 35bf4a3736765..408b020c9501f 100644 > > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c > > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c > > @@ -176,6 +176,9 @@ static int gp_init_delay; > > module_param(gp_init_delay, int, 0444); > > static int gp_cleanup_delay; > > module_param(gp_cleanup_delay, int, 0444); > > +static int nocb_patience_delay; > > +module_param(nocb_patience_delay, int, 0444); > > +static int nocb_patience_delay_jiffies; > > > > // Add delay to rcu_read_unlock() for strict grace periods. > > static int rcu_unlock_delay; > > @@ -4344,11 +4347,14 @@ static int rcu_pending(int user) > > return 1; > > > > /* Is this a nohz_full CPU in userspace or idle? (Ignore RCU if so.) */ > > - if ((user || rcu_is_cpu_rrupt_from_idle()) && rcu_nohz_full_cpu()) > > + gp_in_progress = rcu_gp_in_progress(); > > + if ((user || rcu_is_cpu_rrupt_from_idle() || > > + (gp_in_progress && > > + time_before(jiffies, READ_ONCE(rcu_state.gp_start) + nocb_patience_delay_jiffies))) && > > + rcu_nohz_full_cpu()) > > return 0; > > > > /* Is the RCU core waiting for a quiescent state from this CPU? */ > > - gp_in_progress = rcu_gp_in_progress(); > > if (rdp->core_needs_qs && !rdp->cpu_no_qs.b.norm && gp_in_progress) > > return 1; > > > > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h > > index 340bbefe5f652..31c539f09c150 100644 > > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h > > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h > > @@ -93,6 +93,16 @@ static void __init rcu_bootup_announce_oddness(void) > > pr_info("\tRCU debug GP init slowdown %d jiffies.\n", gp_init_delay); > > if (gp_cleanup_delay) > > pr_info("\tRCU debug GP cleanup slowdown %d jiffies.\n", gp_cleanup_delay); > > + if (nocb_patience_delay < 0) { > > + pr_info("\tRCU NOCB CPU patience negative (%d), resetting to zero.\n", nocb_patience_delay); > > + nocb_patience_delay = 0; > > + } else if (nocb_patience_delay > 5 * MSEC_PER_SEC) { > > + pr_info("\tRCU NOCB CPU patience too large (%d), resetting to %ld.\n", nocb_patience_delay, 5 * MSEC_PER_SEC); > > + nocb_patience_delay = 5 * MSEC_PER_SEC; > > + } else if (nocb_patience_delay) { > > + pr_info("\tRCU NOCB CPU patience set to %d milliseconds.\n", nocb_patience_delay); > > + } > > + nocb_patience_delay_jiffies = msecs_to_jiffies(nocb_patience_delay); > > if (!use_softirq) > > pr_info("\tRCU_SOFTIRQ processing moved to rcuc kthreads.\n"); > > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_EQS_DEBUG)) > > -- > > 2.40.1 > > >
