[PATCH 41/48] rcutorture: Re-use value stored to ->rtort_pipe_count instead of re-reading

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: linke li <lilinke99@xxxxxx>

Currently, the rcu_torture_pipe_update_one() writes the value (i + 1)
to rp->rtort_pipe_count, then immediately re-reads it in order to compare
it to RCU_TORTURE_PIPE_LEN.  This re-read is pointless because no other
update to rp->rtort_pipe_count can occur at this point.  This commit
therefore instead re-uses the (i + 1) value stored in the comparison
instead of re-reading rp->rtort_pipe_count.

Signed-off-by: linke li <lilinke99@xxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
index 0cb5452ecd94..dd7d5ba45740 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
@@ -467,7 +467,7 @@ rcu_torture_pipe_update_one(struct rcu_torture *rp)
 	atomic_inc(&rcu_torture_wcount[i]);
 	WRITE_ONCE(rp->rtort_pipe_count, i + 1);
 	ASSERT_EXCLUSIVE_WRITER(rp->rtort_pipe_count);
-	if (rp->rtort_pipe_count >= RCU_TORTURE_PIPE_LEN) {
+	if (i + 1 >= RCU_TORTURE_PIPE_LEN) {
 		rp->rtort_mbtest = 0;
 		return true;
 	}
-- 
2.39.2





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux