On 07/05/24 00:18, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > Le Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 11:17:19AM +0200, Valentin Schneider a écrit : >> The context_tracking.state RCU_DYNTICKS subvariable has been renamed to >> RCU_WATCHING, reflect that change in the related helpers. >> >> Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> kernel/rcu/tree.c | 6 +++--- >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c >> index bb0d9dd8b6d3a..fe2beb7d2e82d 100644 >> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c >> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c >> @@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ void rcu_softirq_qs(void) >> } >> >> /* >> - * Reset the current CPU's ->dynticks counter to indicate that the >> + * Reset the current CPU's RCU_WATCHING counter to indicate that the >> * newly onlined CPU is no longer in an extended quiescent state. >> * This will either leave the counter unchanged, or increment it >> * to the next non-quiescent value. >> @@ -289,7 +289,7 @@ void rcu_softirq_qs(void) >> * of the ->dynticks counter are manipulated only by the corresponding CPU, >> * or when the corresponding CPU is offline. >> */ >> -static void rcu_dynticks_eqs_online(void) >> +static void rcu_watching_eqs_online(void) > > Or simply rcu_watching_online? > Myes, that's better. I went with keeping the "eqs" suffix for most of the symbols, but I think here it can go.
