> > On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 12:49:50PM +0800, Z qiang wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 07:35:24PM +0800, Zqiang wrote: > > > > The rcu_tasks_percpu structure's->lazy_timer is queued only when > > > > the rcu_tasks structure's->lazy_jiffies is not equal to zero in > > > > call_rcu_tasks_generic(), if the lazy_timer callback is invoked, > > > > that means the lazy_jiffes is not equal to zero, this commit > > > > therefore remove lazy_jiffies check in call_rcu_tasks_generic_timer(). > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > kernel/rcu/tasks.h | 2 +- > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h > > > > index b1254cf3c210..439e0b9a2656 100644 > > > > --- a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h > > > > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h > > > > @@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ static void call_rcu_tasks_generic_timer(struct timer_list *tlp) > > > > > > > > rtp = rtpcp->rtpp; > > > > raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rtpcp, flags); > > > > - if (!rcu_segcblist_empty(&rtpcp->cblist) && rtp->lazy_jiffies) { > > > > + if (!rcu_segcblist_empty(&rtpcp->cblist)) { > > > > > > Good eyes! > > > > > > But did you test with something like a WARN_ON_ONCE(rtp->lazy_jiffies)? > > > > Hi, Paul > > > > + if (!rcu_segcblist_empty(&rtpcp->cblist) && > > !WARN_ON_ONCE(!rtp->lazy_jiffies)) > > > > I've done tests like this: > > > > 1. runqemu nographic kvm slirp qemuparams="-smp 4 -m 2048M -drive > > file=$PWD/share.img,if=virtio" > > bootparams="rcupdate.rcu_tasks_trace_lazy_ms=0" -d > > > > 2. insmod torture.ko > > insmod rcutorture.ko torture_type=tasks-tracing fwd_progress=4 > > > > 3. bpftrace -e 't:timer:timer_expire_entry /args->function == > > kaddr("call_rcu_tasks_generic_timer")/ > > { > > printf("comm:%s,cpu:%d,stack:%s,func:%s\n", comm, cpu, kstack, > > ksym(args->function)); }' > > > > The call_rcu_tasks_generic_timer() has never been executed. > > Very good! > > Then if we get a couple of acks or reviews from the others acknowledging > that if they ever make ->lazy_jiffies be changeable at runtime, they > will remember to do something to adjust this logic appropriately, I will > take it. ;-) > Hi, Paul Would it be better to modify it as follows? set needwake not depend on lazy_jiffies, if ->lazy_jiffies be changed at runtime, and set it to zero, will miss the chance to wake up gp kthreads. diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h index e7ac9138a4fd..aea2b71af36c 100644 --- a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h +++ b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h @@ -299,11 +299,12 @@ static void call_rcu_tasks_generic_timer(struct timer_list *tlp) rtp = rtpcp->rtpp; raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rtpcp, flags); - if (!rcu_segcblist_empty(&rtpcp->cblist) && rtp->lazy_jiffies) { + if (!rcu_segcblist_empty(&rtpcp->cblist)) { if (!rtpcp->urgent_gp) rtpcp->urgent_gp = 1; needwake = true; - mod_timer(&rtpcp->lazy_timer, rcu_tasks_lazy_time(rtp)); + if (rtp->lazy_jiffies) + mod_timer(&rtpcp->lazy_timer, rcu_tasks_lazy_time(rtp)); } raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rtpcp, flags); if (needwake) Thanks Zqiang > Thanx, Paul > > > Thanks > > Zqiang > > > > > > > > > > Thanx, Paul > > > > > > > if (!rtpcp->urgent_gp) > > > > rtpcp->urgent_gp = 1; > > > > needwake = true; > > > > -- > > > > 2.17.1 > > > >