> So what do I do about this? I see you submitted this to the patch system > on the 8th March, but proposed a different approach on the 9th March. I > don't see evidence that Paul is happy with the original approach either > and there's no ack/r-b's on anything here. I think we need to wait for feedback from Will Deacon regarding the new arch_spin_lock() based approach. So please abandon the original proposal in the patch system, at least for now…
