Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/372] 6.1.64-rc1 review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 25 Nov 2023 at 00:17, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.64 release.
> There are 372 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 26 Nov 2023 17:19:17 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.64-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Following build warnings / errors noticed while building the
arm64 tinyconfig on stable-rc linux-6.1.y, linux-6.5.y and linux-6.6.y.

> Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@xxxxxxxxxx>
>     rcu: Dump memory object info if callback function is invalid

Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@xxxxxxxxxx>

Build log:
kernel/rcu/update.c:49:
kernel/rcu/rcu.h: In function 'debug_rcu_head_callback':
kernel/rcu/rcu.h:218:17: error: implicit declaration of function
'kmem_dump_obj'; did you mean 'mem_dump_obj'?
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
  218 |                 kmem_dump_obj(rhp);
      |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |                 mem_dump_obj
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux