Re: [BUG] Random intermittent boost failures (Was Re: [BUG] TREE04..)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 04:30:20PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 4:16 AM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> [..]
> > > I am digging deeper to see why the rcu_preempt thread cannot be pushed out
> > > and then I'll also look at why is it being pushed out in the first place.
> > >
> > > At least I have a strong repro now running 5 instances of TREE03 in parallel
> > > for several hours.
> >
> > Very good!  Then why not boot with rcutorture.onoff_interval=0 and see if
> > the problem still occurs?  If yes, then there is definitely some reason
> > other than CPU hotplug that makes this happen.
> 
> Hi Paul,
> So looks so far like onoff_interval=0 makes the issue disappear. So
> likely hotplug related. I am ok with doing the cpus_read_lock during
> boost testing and seeing if that fixes it. If it does, I can move on
> to the next thing in my backlog.
> 
> What do you think? Or should I spend more time root-causing it? It is
> most like runaway RT threads combined with the CPU hotplug threads,
> making scheduling of the rcu_preempt thread not happen. But I can't
> say for sure without more/better tracing (Speaking of better tracing,
> I am adding core-dump support to rcutorture, but it is not there yet).

This would not be the first time rcutorture has had trouble with those
threads, so I am for adding the cpus_read_lock().

Additional root-causing might be helpful, but then again, you might
have higher priority things to worry about.  ;-)

							Thanx, Paul



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux