Re: [BUG] NOHZ tick-stop error: local softirq work is pending

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Sep 09, 2023 at 10:28:36PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> Hi Paul, Frederic, ever since this recent patch got merged into all
> recent stables:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230818200757.1808398-1-paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>  ..
> 
> .. I am seeing this happen a lot now causing rcutorture failures:
> "NOHZ tick-stop error: local softirq work is pending"
> 
> It looks like the "tick-stop error" as local_bh_blocked always returns
> false on !PREEMPT_RT, so that patch itself seems correct.
> 
> However, it appears the string in console-badness.sh is different:
> 
> console-badness.sh:grep -v 'NOHZ tick-stop error: Non-RCU local
> softirq work is pending, handler'
> 
> So the string in the script needs an update?

Looks like it, though I believe that there is a fix in the offing,
at which point that "grep -v" should just be removed.  Depending on
timing, of course.

> Also, considering that it is being grep -v'ed out, any background on
> why this message is not bad and any history? Why is softirq work
> pending when the tick is stopped?

That was so long back that it is pretty hazy.  I vaguely recall that
this was considered to be in need of fixing, but a false positive from
a torture-test perspective.

							Thanx, Paul



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux