Re: [BUG] TREE04 hang on 6.5.y stable: Writer stall state RTWS_COND_SYNC_FULL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 08:51:43PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 4:03 PM Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Sep 7, 2023, at 12:23 PM, Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 09:17:15AM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >> Just started seeing this on 6.5 stable. It is new and first occurrence:
> > >>
> > >> TREE04 no success message, 234 successful version messages
> > >> [033mWARNING:  [mTREE04 GP HANG at 14 torture stat 2
> > >> [   38.371120] ??? Writer stall state RTWS_COND_SYNC_FULL(10) g1253
> > >> f0x0 ->state 0x2 cpu 6
> > >> [   38.388342] Call Trace:
> > >> [   53.741039] ??? Writer stall state RTWS_COND_SYNC_FULL(10) g3637
> > >> f0x2 ->state 0x2 cpu 6
> > >> [   69.093462] ??? Writer stall state RTWS_COND_SYNC_FULL(10) g5501
> > >> f0x0 ->state 0x2 cpu 6
> > >> [   84.450028] ??? Writer stall state RTWS_COND_SYNC_FULL(10) g10505
> > >> f0x0 ->state 0x2 cpu 6
> > >> [   99.815871] ??? Writer stall state RTWS_COND_SYNC_FULL(10) g13781
> > >> f0x0 ->state 0x2 cpu 6
> > >> [  115.166476] ??? Writer stall state RTWS_COND_SYNC_FULL(10) g16544
> > >> f0x0 ->state 0x2 cpu 6
> > >> [  130.550116] ??? Writer stall state RTWS_COND_SYNC_FULL(10) g18941
> > >> f0x0 ->state 0x2 cpu 6
> > >> [..]
> > >>
> > >> All logs:
> > >> http://box.joelfernandes.org:9080/job/rcutorture_stable/job/linux-6.5.y/17/artifact/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/res/2023.09.07-04.10.25/TREE04/
> > >
> > > Huh.  Does this happen for you in v6.5 mainline?
> > >
> > > Both the code under test (full-state polled grace periods) and the
> > > rcutorture test code are fairly new, so there is some reason for general
> > > suspicion.  ;-)
> >
> > Ah. I never saw it on either 6.5 mainline or stable till today. Even on stable
> > I only ever saw it this once. On mainline I have not seen it yet but I do test
> > stable much more since I have been on stable maintenance duty ;-).
> 
> I did a couple of long runs and I am not able to reproduce it anymore. :-/

I know that feeling!

							Thanx, Paul



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux