> > For a comparison, I've attached a journalctl log for my custom 6.4.14 Kernel. > 1. I tried to apply your patches on stable 6.5.1 kernel. All of them can be applied except of one. Its name is 0001-ms178.patch and it produces below rejects: <snip> arch/alpha/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl.rej arch/arm/tools/syscall.tbl.rej arch/arm64/include/asm/unistd.h.rej arch/arm64/include/asm/unistd32.h.rej arch/ia64/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl.rej arch/m68k/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl.rej arch/microblaze/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl.rej arch/mips/kernel/syscalls/syscall_n32.tbl.rej arch/mips/kernel/syscalls/syscall_n64.tbl.rej arch/mips/kernel/syscalls/syscall_o32.tbl.rej arch/parisc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl.rej arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl.rej arch/s390/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl.rej arch/sh/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl.rej arch/sparc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl.rej arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl.rej arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl.rej arch/xtensa/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl.rej include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h.rej <snip> But let's skip that part. 2. One of patches also modifies the kernel/rcu/tree.c file: <snip> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c index 1449cb69a0e0..fbc20c6cdbeb 100644 --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c @@ -2810,6 +2810,7 @@ struct kfree_rcu_cpu_work { /** * struct kfree_rcu_cpu - batch up kfree_rcu() requests for RCU grace period + * @gp_snap: The GP snapshot recorded at the last scheduling of monitor work. * @head: List of kfree_rcu() objects not yet waiting for a grace period * @head_gp_snap: Snapshot of RCU state for objects placed to "@head" * @bulk_head: Bulk-List of kvfree_rcu() objects not yet waiting for a grace period @@ -2849,6 +2850,7 @@ struct kfree_rcu_cpu { struct kfree_rcu_cpu_work krw_arr[KFREE_N_BATCHES]; raw_spinlock_t lock; struct delayed_work monitor_work; + unsigned long gp_snap; bool initialized; struct delayed_work page_cache_work; @@ -3095,6 +3097,7 @@ schedule_delayed_monitor_work(struct kfree_rcu_cpu *krcp) mod_delayed_work(system_wq, &krcp->monitor_work, delay); return; } + krcp->gp_snap = get_state_synchronize_rcu(); queue_delayed_work(system_wq, &krcp->monitor_work, delay); } @@ -3187,7 +3190,10 @@ static void kfree_rcu_monitor(struct work_struct *work) // be that the work is in the pending state when // channels have been detached following by each // other. - queue_rcu_work(system_wq, &krwp->rcu_work); + if (poll_state_synchronize_rcu(krcp->gp_snap)) + queue_work(system_wq, &krwp->rcu_work.work); + else + queue_rcu_work(system_wq, &krwp->rcu_work); } } <snip> i do not understand where you got this patch and what a reason behind of applying is. 3. Could you please remove that patch(revert it) and try one more time? 4. When i apply all your patches i see that you modify: urezki@pc638:~/data/raid0/coding/linux-stable.git$ git st | wc -l 455 urezki@pc638:~/data/raid0/coding/linux-stable.git$ 455 files. The delta is huge. It touches arch, mm, rcu, drivers, crypto, include/linux/ generic headers, init, kernel, lib, net, etc parts. So as a result we have: <snip> 451 files changed, 34218 insertions(+), 5576 deletions(-) <snip> -- Uladzislau Rezki