On Sat, Jul 29, 2023 at 02:27:36PM +0000, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> The return keyword is not needed here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Odd that this is allowed. ;-)
I took 1, 2, and 5, thank you! It would still be good to get Frederic's
eyes on 3 and 4.
Thanx, Paul
> ---
> kernel/rcu/tree.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> index cb1caefa8bd0..7c79480bfaa0 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> @@ -2713,7 +2713,7 @@ __call_rcu_common(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func, bool lazy_in)
> */
> void call_rcu_hurry(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func)
> {
> - return __call_rcu_common(head, func, false);
> + __call_rcu_common(head, func, false);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(call_rcu_hurry);
> #endif
> @@ -2764,7 +2764,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(call_rcu_hurry);
> */
> void call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func)
> {
> - return __call_rcu_common(head, func, IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_LAZY));
> + __call_rcu_common(head, func, IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_LAZY));
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(call_rcu);
>
> --
> 2.41.0.487.g6d72f3e995-goog
>
