Re: [GIT PULL] RCU changes for v6.5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] RCU changes for v6.5
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2023 11:00:50 -0300
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Zhu Yanjun <zyjzyj2000@xxxxxxxxx>, Leon Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kernel-team@xxxxxxxx, mingo@xxxxxxxxxx, tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, rcu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <9b1a620a-975a-490f-b9ee-6aea7c8effe0@paulmck-laptop>

On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 06:46:50AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:

> The revert meant that 0-day didn't see -rcu without the single-argument
> kfree_rcu() definition.

0-day is also supposed to run on your branches, not just linux-next,
at least it does for my trees..

Jason

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [GIT PULL] RCU changes for v6.5
  - From: Paul E. McKenney

References:
- [GIT PULL] RCU changes for v6.5
  - From: Paul E. McKenney
- Re: [GIT PULL] RCU changes for v6.5
  - From: Linus Torvalds
- Re: [GIT PULL] RCU changes for v6.5
  - From: Paul E. McKenney
- Re: [GIT PULL] RCU changes for v6.5
  - From: Jason Gunthorpe
- Re: [GIT PULL] RCU changes for v6.5
  - From: Paul E. McKenney

Prev by Date: Re: [GIT PULL] RCU changes for v6.5
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 06/13] bpf: Further refactor alloc_bulk().
Previous by thread: Re: [GIT PULL] RCU changes for v6.5
Next by thread: Re: [GIT PULL] RCU changes for v6.5
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Samsung SoC] [Linux Rockchip SoC] [Linux Actions SoC] [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux