On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 12:27:51PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > > Anyway, the naming is whack, but I don't have a proposed better name, > > except you might want to put "scope_" as the prefix not the suffix, but > > then that might look odd to, so who knows. > > FWIW C++ has std::scoped_lock. So perhaps using a similar wording may help ? Yeah, C++ is a lot more flexible than CPP crazies. But yeah, happy to change it that way.
