On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 03:09:36PM +0800, Adrian Huang wrote: > From: Adrian Huang <ahuang12@xxxxxxxxxx> > > It should be "Please note that ..." instead of "Please not that ...". > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Huang <ahuang12@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> thanks, - Joel > --- > Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst b/Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst > index cc361fb01ed4..bd3c58c44bef 100644 > --- a/Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst > +++ b/Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst > @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ over a rather long period of time, but improvements are always welcome! > can serve as rcu_read_lock_sched(), but is less readable and > prevents lockdep from detecting locking issues. > > - Please not that you *cannot* rely on code known to be built > + Please note that you *cannot* rely on code known to be built > only in non-preemptible kernels. Such code can and will break, > especially in kernels built with CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT=y. > > -- > 2.34.1 >
