On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 04:31:08PM +0800, Qiuxu Zhuo wrote: > "Please not that you *cannot* rely..." probably has a typo. > Fix it. > > Signed-off-by: Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > Not sure whether it's a too small typo to need this patch. > If so, sorry for the noise. :-) Not at all! Queued for the v6.4 merge window, thank you. (Not the upcoming merge window, but the one after that.) Thanx, Paul > Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst b/Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst > index cc361fb01ed4..bd3c58c44bef 100644 > --- a/Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst > +++ b/Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst > @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ over a rather long period of time, but improvements are always welcome! > can serve as rcu_read_lock_sched(), but is less readable and > prevents lockdep from detecting locking issues. > > - Please not that you *cannot* rely on code known to be built > + Please note that you *cannot* rely on code known to be built > only in non-preemptible kernels. Such code can and will break, > especially in kernels built with CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT=y. > > -- > 2.17.1 >
