Re: RCU stalls with TREE07 on v6.0 kernel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Joel

As a beginner, I am interested and I have time, could you tell me
where to download 6.0.16-rc2-g50f737b34ede when you are convenient?
And could you tell me which torture command you are invoking? I may
help to do some tests ;-)

Cheers
Zhouyi

On Sat, Dec 31, 2022 at 9:46 AM Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have been firefighting a hang on 6.0.y stable kernels with
> rcutorture. It happens mostly consistently when TREE07 is shutting
> down.
>
> It appears that the RCU torture threads are attempted to stop but the
> shutdown thread, but are constantly awakened by a timer softirq
> handler in ksoftirqd context. When they wake up, they immediately goto
> sleep in uninterruptible state until the next time a timer handler
> wakes them up. It appears the timer softirq is long enough to cause
> RCU stalls and I see it calling 100s of timer function handlers
> (call_timer_fn).
>
> I am doing some more investigation with trace_printk(s):
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jfern/linux.git/commit/?h=stable/trace-hang-6.0.y&id=b779b1e92c97f29333a282ee8f548da02f64de2b
>
> Regarding the timer handlers, I was wondering if it is possible that a
> large number of timer handlers constantly queued can cause RCU stalls
> due to the timer softirq taking a very long time. That certainly
> appears to be the case here. Shouldn't the timer softirq also do
> rcu_softirq_qs() similar to the ksoftirq loop, in case there are too
> many of them?
>
> Here is a full log with trace dump if you anyone wants to take a look:
> http://box.joelfernandes.org:9080/job/rcutorture_stable/job/linux-6.0.y/11/artifact/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/res/2022.12.30-22.57.13/TREE07.2/console.log
> And the res directory:
> http://box.joelfernandes.org:9080/job/rcutorture_stable/job/linux-6.0.y/11/artifact/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/res/2022.12.30-22.57.13/TREE07.2/
>
> Any thoughts on any patches 6.0 might be missing?
>
> Meanwhile, debug here continues... thanks,
>
>  - Joel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux