Re: [PATCHv2] srcu: Eliminate the requirement of SRCU_SIZE_WAIT_CALL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sorry to reply late. I was interrupted by something else.

On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 02:17:13PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 11:34:59AM +0800, Pingfan Liu wrote:
> > From: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@xxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > The state SRCU_SIZE_WAIT_CALL is only used in srcu_gp_start_if_needed().
> > And it is not needed. Because counter_wrap_check has guarantee that both
> > srcu_gp_seq_needed and srcu_gp_seq_needed_exp are not far behind
> > srcu_gp_seq and no false alarm will be raised by the statement in
> > srcu_gp_start_if_needed()
> > 
> >   ULONG_CMP_LT(sdp->srcu_gp_seq_needed, s)
> > 
> > As a result, once if SRCU_SIZE_WAIT_BARRIER is seen, the tree snp can be
> > used immediately, not need to wait for another srcu_gp_end() to update
> > the srcu_gp_seq_needed and srcu_gp_seq_needed_exp to avoid false alarm.
> 
> During the SRCU_SIZE_WAIT_BARRIER state, all callbacks are queued onto
> the boot CPU's callback list, but the srcu_barrier() function scans all
> of the CPUs' callback lists.
> 

So at present, your concern is around how it affects srcu_barrier(), right?

> So can't this cause srcu_gp_start_if_needed() to rcu_segcblist_advance()
> and rcu_segcblist_accelerate() a callback list that is guaranteed to be
> empty?  Without this change, the might-not-be-empty boot CPU's callback
> list is dealt with.
> 

Is it a problem that srcu_gp_start_if_needed() asks
rcu_segcblist_advance() and rcu_segcblist_accelerate() to manipulate an
not-be-empty callback list ? At SRCU_SIZE_WAIT_BARRIER state,
srcu_barrier() will take care of all cpus' callback list.

> What am I missing here?  More specifically, what benefits does this
> change provide?  I am not yet seeing any.
> 

I am trying to improve the note around SRCU_SIZE_xx, and this is a
trivial improve from 8 SRCU_SIZE state to 5.


Thanks,

	Pingfan

> 							Thanx, Paul
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: "Zhang, Qiang1" <qiang1.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
> > To: rcu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > ---
> > v1 -> v2:
> >  rebase onto dev branch
> >  kernel/rcu/srcutree.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
> > index b25f77df9e5e..b0278d1e9c1f 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
> > +++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
> > @@ -1165,7 +1165,7 @@ static unsigned long srcu_gp_start_if_needed(struct srcu_struct *ssp,
> >  	 */
> >  	idx = __srcu_read_lock_nmisafe(ssp);
> >  	ss_state = smp_load_acquire(&ssp->srcu_size_state);
> > -	if (ss_state < SRCU_SIZE_WAIT_CALL)
> > +	if (ss_state < SRCU_SIZE_WAIT_BARRIER)
> >  		sdp = per_cpu_ptr(ssp->sda, get_boot_cpu_id());
> >  	else
> >  		sdp = raw_cpu_ptr(ssp->sda);
> > -- 
> > 2.31.1
> > 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux