> On Nov 30, 2022, at 4:43 PM, Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 02:20:52PM -0500, Joel Fernandes wrote: >> >> >>>> On Nov 30, 2022, at 2:09 PM, David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Note that this conflicts with my patch: >> >> Oh. I don’t see any review or Ack tags on it. Is it still under review? > > So what I have done is to drop this patch from the series, but to also > preserve it for posterity at -rcu branch lazy-obsolete.2022.11.30a. > > It looks like that wakeup is still delayed, but I could easily be > missing something. > > Joel, could you please test the effects of having the current lazy branch, > but also David Howells's patch? That way, if there is an issue, we can > work it sooner rather than later, and if it all works fine, we can stop > worrying about it. ;-) Sure, I will kick off the failing test and see if it passes with Davids patch. Will let you know. Thanks, - Joel > Thanx, Paul > >> Thanks, >> >> - Joel >> >> >> >>> >>> rxrpc: Don't hold a ref for connection workqueue >>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git/commit/?h=rxrpc-next&id=450b00011290660127c2d76f5c5ed264126eb229 >>> >>> which should render it unnecessary. It's a little ahead of yours in the >>> net-next queue, if that means anything. >>> >>> David >>>
