Re: [PATCH 1/3] srcu: Eliminate the requirement of SRCU_SIZE_WAIT_CALL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 10:01:08PM +0800, Pingfan Liu wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 08:40:22AM +0000, Zhang, Qiang1 wrote:
> > >The state SRCU_SIZE_WAIT_CALL is only used in srcu_gp_start_if_needed().
> > >And it is not needed. Because counter_wrap_check has guarantee that both
> > >srcu_gp_seq_needed and srcu_gp_seq_needed_exp are not far behind
> > >srcu_gp_seq and no false alarm will be raised by the statement in
> > >srcu_gp_start_if_needed()
> > >
> > >  ULONG_CMP_LT(sdp->srcu_gp_seq_needed, s)
> > >
> > >As a result, once if SRCU_SIZE_WAIT_BARRIER is seen, the tree snp can be
> > >used immediately, not need to wait for another srcu_gp_end() to update
> > >the srcu_gp_seq_needed and srcu_gp_seq_needed_exp to avoid false alarm.
> > >
> > >Signed-off-by: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >Cc: "Zhang, Qiang1" <qiang1.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >To: rcu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >---
> > > kernel/rcu/srcutree.c | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > >diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
> > >index 1c304fec89c0..fe0759d89c2d 100644
> > >--- a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
> > >+++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
> > >@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ static unsigned long srcu_gp_start_if_needed(struct srcu_struct *ssp,
> > > 	check_init_srcu_struct(ssp);
> > > 	idx = srcu_read_lock(ssp);
> > > 	ss_state = smp_load_acquire(&ssp->srcu_size_state);
> > >-	if (ss_state < SRCU_SIZE_WAIT_CALL)
> > >+	if (ss_state < SRCU_SIZE_WAIT_BARRIER)
> > > 		sdp = per_cpu_ptr(ssp->sda, 0);
> > 
> > Hi Pingfan
> > 
> > should it be used get_boot_cpu_id() ?
> 
> I am not sure which branch to work on.

For RCU patches, the "dev" branch of the -rcu tree.

For more information, please see:

https://mirrors.edge.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/paulmck/rcutodo.html

							Thanx, Paul

> Thanks,
> 
> 	Pingfan
> 
> > Thanks
> > Zqiang
> > 
> > > 	else
> > > 		sdp = raw_cpu_ptr(ssp->sda);
> > >-- 
> > >2.31.1
> > >



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux