On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 09:57:18AM +0800, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote: > > > On 2022/11/17 6:39, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 09:07:07PM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote: > >> @@ -262,6 +279,8 @@ struct rcu_data { > >> short rcu_onl_gp_flags; /* ->gp_flags at last online. */ > >> unsigned long last_fqs_resched; /* Time of last rcu_resched(). */ > >> unsigned long last_sched_clock; /* Jiffies of last rcu_sched_clock_irq(). */ > >> + struct rcu_snap_record snap_record; /* Snapshot of core stats at half of */ > >> + /* the first RCU stall timeout */ > > > > This should be under #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_CPUTIME > > This will not work for now because we also support boot option > rcupdate.rcu_cpu_stall_cputime. I'm confused. If CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_CPUTIME=n then rcupdate.rcu_cpu_stall_cputime has no effect, right? Thanks. > > > > >> +static void print_cpu_stat_info(int cpu) > >> +{ > >> + struct rcu_snap_record rsr, *rsrp; > >> + struct rcu_data *rdp = per_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data, cpu); > >> + struct kernel_cpustat *kcsp = &kcpustat_cpu(cpu); > >> + > >> + if (!rcu_cpu_stall_cputime) > >> + return; > >> + > >> + rsrp = &rdp->snap_record; > >> + if (rsrp->gp_seq != rdp->gp_seq) > >> + return; > >> + > >> + rsr.cputime_irq = kcpustat_field(kcsp, CPUTIME_IRQ, cpu); > >> + rsr.cputime_softirq = kcpustat_field(kcsp, CPUTIME_SOFTIRQ, cpu); > >> + rsr.cputime_system = kcpustat_field(kcsp, CPUTIME_SYSTEM, cpu); > >> + > >> + pr_err("\t hardirqs softirqs csw/system\n"); > >> + pr_err("\t number: %8ld %10d %12lld\n", > >> + kstat_cpu_irqs_sum(cpu) - rsrp->nr_hardirqs, > >> + kstat_cpu_softirqs_sum(cpu) - rsrp->nr_softirqs, > >> + nr_context_switches_cpu(cpu) - rsrp->nr_csw); > >> + pr_err("\tcputime: %8lld %10lld %12lld ==> %lld(ms)\n", > >> + div_u64(rsr.cputime_irq - rsrp->cputime_irq, NSEC_PER_MSEC), > >> + div_u64(rsr.cputime_softirq - rsrp->cputime_softirq, NSEC_PER_MSEC), > >> + div_u64(rsr.cputime_system - rsrp->cputime_system, NSEC_PER_MSEC), > >> + jiffies64_to_msecs(jiffies - rsrp->jiffies)); > > > > jiffies_to_msecs() should be enough. > > OK, thanks. > > > > > Thanks. > > > > . > > > > -- > Regards, > Zhen Lei