On 2022/11/14 20:50, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 08:45:26PM +0800, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2022/11/14 19:42, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 09:07:05PM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
>>>> Similar to kstat_cpu_irqs_sum(), it counts the sum of all software
>>>> interrupts on a specified CPU.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>> include/linux/kernel_stat.h | 11 +++++++++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/kernel_stat.h b/include/linux/kernel_stat.h
>>>> index 90e2fdc17d79ff8..898076e173a928a 100644
>>>> --- a/include/linux/kernel_stat.h
>>>> +++ b/include/linux/kernel_stat.h
>>>> @@ -67,6 +67,17 @@ static inline unsigned int kstat_softirqs_cpu(unsigned int irq, int cpu)
>>>> return kstat_cpu(cpu).softirqs[irq];
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> +static inline unsigned int kstat_cpu_softirqs_sum(int cpu)
>>>> +{
>>>> + int i;
>>>> + unsigned int sum = 0;
>>>> +
>>>> + for (i = 0; i < NR_SOFTIRQS; i++)
>>>> + sum += kstat_softirqs_cpu(i, cpu);
>>>
>>> This should return a u64 or at least an unsigned long so that high
>>> numbers of CPUs don't overflow easily.
>>
>> OK! Then I'll adjust the following types by the way.
>>
>> struct kernel_stat {
>> unsigned long irqs_sum;
>> unsigned int softirqs[NR_SOFTIRQS];
>> };
>>
>> static inline unsigned int kstat_softirqs_cpu(unsigned int irq, int cpu)
>
> And I also misread kstat_softirqs_cpu() content, my bad. Although at some point
> the sum of all softirqs within a single CPU might overflow in an int so I guess
> that still applies...
Yes, this was discussed before. In fact, I think unsigned int and unsigned
long are all right.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>>> +
>>>> + return sum;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> /*
>>>> * Number of interrupts per specific IRQ source, since bootup
>>>> */
>>>> --
>>>> 2.25.1
>>>>
>>> .
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Zhen Lei
> .
>
--
Regards,
Zhen Lei
